对证据和政策系统发展的学术贡献：EPPI 中心集体自民族志,Health Research Policy and Systems

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Health Res. Policy Syst. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

对证据和政策系统发展的学术贡献：EPPI 中心集体自民族志
Health Research Policy and Systems ( IF 3.6 ) Pub Date : 2023-10-25 , DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01051-0
Sandy Oliver ₁ , Kelly Dickson ₁ , Mukdarut Bangpan ₁

Affiliation

世界各地出现的政策体系证据将研究综合、循证政策和公众参与研究等领域结合起来。我们进行了这次回顾性集体民族志，以了解学者在开发此类系统中的作用。我们构建了自 1990 年以来 EPPI 中心工作和相关事件的时间表。我们采用：转型理论来揭示新兴的和有影响力的创新；变革性社会创新理论，以追踪其在研究和政策组织中日益增长的深度、影响力和嵌入度。EPPI 中心与其他小型研究单位一起，在研究-政策界面与国家和国际组织合作，孵化、传播和嵌入使用证据和政策的新方法。研究与政策互动所产生的可持续变化，更多的是与组织共同开发和定制创新，以适应其创造新知识或利用知识进行决策的使命和结构。传播和嵌入创新都依赖于相互学习，在合作组织适应更紧密的工作方式时，相互学习既适应又挑战既定的假设和价值观。创新的孵化、传播和嵌入是迭代的，新的工作方式在传播和嵌入时激发了进一步的创新。将政策证据制度化需要在生成证据的机构和制定政策的机构方面进行变革。为推进政策证据做出学术贡献的关键机制是：合同研究重点关注研究与政策的界面；愿意在不熟悉的领域工作；以包容性的方式开展工作，从冲突走向共识；反思和巩固学习的激励和机会。

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography

Evidence for policy systems emerging around the world combine the fields of research synthesis, evidence-informed policy and public engagement with research. We conducted this retrospective collective autoethnography to understand the role of academics in developing such systems. We constructed a timeline of EPPI Centre work and associated events since 1990. We employed: Transition Theory to reveal emerging and influential innovations; and Transformative Social Innovation theory to track their increasing depth, reach and embeddedness in research and policy organisations. The EPPI Centre, alongside other small research units, collaborated with national and international organisations at the research-policy interface to incubate, spread and embed new ways of working with evidence and policy. Sustainable change arising from research-policy interactions was less about uptake and embedding of innovations, but more about co-developing and tailoring innovations with organisations to suit their missions and structures for creating new knowledge or using knowledge for decisions. Both spreading and embedding innovation relied on mutual learning that both accommodated and challenged established assumptions and values of collaborating organisations as they adapted to closer ways of working. The incubation, spread and embedding of innovations have been iterative, with new ways of working inspiring further innovation as they spread and embedded. Institutionalising evidence for policy required change in both institutions generating evidence and institutions developing policy. Key mechanisms for academic contributions to advancing evidence for policy were: contract research focusing attention at the research-policy interface; a willingness to work in unfamiliar fields; inclusive ways of working to move from conflict to consensus; and incentives and opportunities for reflection and consolidating learning.

更新日期：2023-10-25

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊新发论文