Mild mesangial proliferative IgA nephropathy with minimal change disease (MCD-IgAN) and mild mesangial proliferative IgA nephropathy without minimal change disease (Non-MCD-IgAN) have similar characteristics on light microscopy. Nevertheless, their discrepancies in clinicopathological features and prognosis remain unknown. A total of 589 patients with biopsy-proven mild mesangial proliferative IgA nephropathy (M-IgAN) combined with light microscopy and immunofluorescence were enrolled. Firstly, the diagnoses of the patients by electron microscopy were recorded and used as the gold standard. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity using nephrotic syndrome (NS) as the diagnostic criteria to identify MCD-IgAN. Then, excluding patients with a 24-h urinary total protein less than 0.5 g/day, incomplete clinical data, or less than the six-month follow-up, we included 184 cases of non-MCD-IgAN and 98 cases of MCD-IgAN. The patients’ clinicopathological and outcome data were collected and compared. Among the 589 patients, according to electron microscopy, 381 were diagnosed with non-MCD-IgAN, 167 with MCD-IgAN, and 41 with M-IgAN complicated by other glomerular diseases. Using NS as the diagnostic criteria to distinguish non-MCD-IgAN and MCD-IgAN, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.8% and 99.5%, respectively. The patients in the MCD-IgAN group tended to be younger, hypotensive, with lower urinary erythrocytes, and more likely to achieve complete remission, and fewer patients progressed to the endpoint than those in the non-MCD-IgAN group (all P < 0 .05). NS appears to be an objective indicator for differentiating MCD-IgAN from non-MCD-IgAN. Non-MCD-IgAN varies greatly from MCD-IgAN in clinicopathology and treatment response, with a poorer prognosis.