Objective

To investigate whether there is an association between the gestational age at the onset of preeclampsia in recurrent cases and the gestational age at the onset of preeclampsia in previous pregnancies.

Methods

This retrospective nested case–control study was designed to investigate whether gestational age at diagnosis and at delivery in recurrent cases of preeclampsia correlates with gestational age at diagnosis and delivery in the previous cases of preeclampsia in the same individuals. The database of a Ukrainian research network was used to find patients with the diagnosis of preeclampsia between 2019 and 2021. The database was further queried to identify those with a history of preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy. The comparison was made using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results

One hundred and three patients who were diagnosed with preeclampsia were identified. Of those, 15 had recurrent preeclampsia, 2 of whom had preeclampsia in 2 previous pregnancies. There was no statistically significant correlation: based on gestational age at delivery R = − 0.28 (P = 0.30; 95% confidence interval (− 0.69 to 0.28) and based on gestational age at the time of diagnosis R = − 0.14 (P = 0.62; − 0.60 to 0.41).

Conclusion

Our data do not find an association between the gestational age of recurrent preeclampsia and preeclampsia diagnosed in a previous pregnancy. This supports the idea that there is single pathogenesis for preeclampsia regardless of the gestational age. It suggests that there are variations in the course of preeclampsia that may be determined by the capacity of the compensatory mechanisms.