介绍
利拉鲁肽有效控制血糖水平并减轻体重。本研究的目的是比较生物仿制药利拉鲁肽(Melitide ®;CinnaGen,德黑兰,伊朗)与参比利拉鲁肽(Victoza ®;诺和诺德,Bagsvaerd,丹麦)对 2 型糖尿病 (T2DM) 患者的疗效和安全性)。
方法
在这项 3 期临床非劣效性试验中,T2DM 控制不充分且血红蛋白 A 1C (HbA 1C ) 水平为 7-10.5% 且服用至少两种剂量稳定的口服降糖药物至少 3 个月的成年患者被随机分组接受治疗Melitide ® ( n = 150) 或 Victoza ® ( n = 150) 1.8 mg/天,持续 26 周。主要结果是评估 Melitide ®相对于 Victoza ®在 HbA 1C水平变化方面的非劣效性,预设裕度为 0.4%。次要结局是对其他疗效参数的评估(包括实现 HbA 1C水平 < 7%的患者比例)、不良事件发生率和免疫原性。
结果
在参与这项研究的 300 名参与者中,有 235 名参加了符合方案分析(Melitide ®组有 112 名,Victoza ®组有 123 名)。Melitide ®组的 HbA 1C平均(标准差)变化为 − 1.76% (1.22) ,Victoza ®组为 − 1.59% (1.31) 。Melitide ®和 Victoza ®在降低 HbA 1C方面的平均差异的 95% 单侧置信区间 (CI) 上限低于预定范围(平均差异 − 0.18,95% CI − 0.5 至 0.15)。意向治疗分析也得到了类似的结果。两个研究组之间在实现 HbA 1C < 7%的患者比例( p = 0.210)、其他疗效参数 ( p > 0.05) 和报告的不良事件 ( p = 0.916) 方面没有观察到统计学上的显着差异。此外,没有患者产生抗利拉鲁肽抗体。
结论
与参比利拉鲁肽相比,生物仿制药利拉鲁肽 (Melitide ® ) 的疗效并不逊色,且安全性相当。
试用注册
NCT03421119。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Liraglutide (Melitide®) Versus the Reference Liraglutide (Victoza®) in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Clinical Trial
Introduction
Liraglutide effectively controls blood glucose level and reduces body weight. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide®; CinnaGen, Tehran, Iran) to the reference liraglutide (Victoza®; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods
In this phase 3 clinical noninferiority trial, adult patients with inadequately controlled T2DM and with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels of 7–10.5% on at least two oral glucose-lowering drugs with stable doses for at least 3 months were randomized to receive Melitide® (n = 150) or Victoza® (n = 150) 1.8 mg/day for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was assessment of the noninferiority of Melitide® to Victoza® in terms of change in HbA1C level with a prespecified margin of 0.4%. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of additional efficacy parameters (including the proportion of patients achieving HbA1C levels of < 7%), the incidence of adverse events, and immunogenicity.
Results
Of the 300 participants enrolled in this study, 235 were included in the per-protocol analysis (112 in the Melitide® group and 123 in the Victoza® group). The mean (standard deviation) changes in HbA1C were − 1.76% (1.22) in the Melitide® group and − 1.59% (1.31) in the Victoza® group. The upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference between Melitide® and Victoza® in lowering HbA1C was lower than the predefined margin (mean difference − 0.18, 95% CI − 0.5 to 0.15). Similar findings were obtained with the intention-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two study arms regarding the proportion of patients achieving HbA1C < 7% (p = 0.210), other efficacy parameters (p > 0.05), and reported adverse events (p = 0.916). Furthermore, none of the patients developed anti-liraglutide antibodies.
Conclusion
The biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide®) was noninferior in efficacy and comparable in safety when compared with the reference liraglutide.
Trial Registration
NCT03421119.