当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Motivationalism vs. interpretationalism about symmetries: some options overlooked in the debate about the relationship between symmetries and physical equivalence
European Journal for Philosophy of Science ( IF 1.5 ) Pub Date : 2023-08-22 , DOI: 10.1007/s13194-023-00539-4 Joanna Luc
中文翻译:
关于对称性的动机主义与解释主义:关于对称性与物理等价性之间关系的争论中忽略了一些选择
更新日期:2023-08-22
European Journal for Philosophy of Science ( IF 1.5 ) Pub Date : 2023-08-22 , DOI: 10.1007/s13194-023-00539-4 Joanna Luc
In the recent philosophical debate about the relationship between symmetries and physical equivalence, two approaches have been distinguished: motivationalism and interpretationalism. In this paper, I point out that there are variants of interpretationalism that have not been taken into account by the proponents of motivationalism. I also argue that some of these overlooked variants of interpretationalism are not prone to the motivationalists’ criticism and overall are the most attractive positions available.
中文翻译:
关于对称性的动机主义与解释主义:关于对称性与物理等价性之间关系的争论中忽略了一些选择
在最近关于对称性和物理等价性之间关系的哲学辩论中,区分了两种方法:动机主义和解释主义。在本文中,我指出解释主义的一些变体尚未被动机主义的支持者考虑到。我还认为,其中一些被忽视的解释主义变体不容易受到动机主义者的批评,总体而言是最有吸引力的立场。