当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Philosophical Issues
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
“Free will” is vague
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2023-08-19 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12238 Santiago Amaya 1
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2023-08-19 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12238 Santiago Amaya 1
Affiliation
This paper argues that “free will” is vague. The argument has two steps. First, I argue that free will is a matter of degrees and, second, that there are no sharp boundaries separating free decisions and actions and non-free ones. After presenting the argument, I focus on one significant consequence of the thesis, although others are mentioned along the way. In short, considerations of vagueness help understand the logic behind so-called manipulation arguments, but also show why these arguments are ultimately flawed.
中文翻译:
“自由意志”含糊不清
本文认为“自由意志”是模糊的。论证有两个步骤。首先,我认为自由意志是一个程度问题,其次,自由决定和行动与非自由决定和行动之间没有明确的界限。在提出论点之后,我将重点放在论文的一个重要结论上,尽管一路上也提到了其他一些结论。简而言之,对模糊性的考虑有助于理解所谓的操纵论点背后的逻辑,但也表明了为什么这些论点最终是有缺陷的。
更新日期:2023-08-19
中文翻译:
“自由意志”含糊不清
本文认为“自由意志”是模糊的。论证有两个步骤。首先,我认为自由意志是一个程度问题,其次,自由决定和行动与非自由决定和行动之间没有明确的界限。在提出论点之后,我将重点放在论文的一个重要结论上,尽管一路上也提到了其他一些结论。简而言之,对模糊性的考虑有助于理解所谓的操纵论点背后的逻辑,但也表明了为什么这些论点最终是有缺陷的。