当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Philosophical Issues
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Epistemic control without voluntarism
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2023-08-19 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12245 Timothy R. Kearl 1
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2023-08-19 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12245 Timothy R. Kearl 1
Affiliation
It is tempting to think (though many deny) that epistemic agents exercise a distinctive kind of control over their belief-like attitudes. My aim here is to sketch a “bottom-up” model of epistemic agency, one that draws on an analogous model of practical agency, according to which an agent's conditional beliefs are reasons-responsive planning states that initiate and sustain mental behavior so as to render controlled.
中文翻译:
无自愿的认知控制
人们很容易认为(尽管许多人否认)认知主体对他们的信仰态度施加了一种独特的控制。我在这里的目的是勾画出一种“自下而上”的认知能动性模型,该模型借鉴了实践能动性的类似模型,根据该模型,主体的条件信念是原因响应的计划状态,它启动并维持心理行为,以便渲染控制。
更新日期:2023-08-19
中文翻译:
无自愿的认知控制
人们很容易认为(尽管许多人否认)认知主体对他们的信仰态度施加了一种独特的控制。我在这里的目的是勾画出一种“自下而上”的认知能动性模型,该模型借鉴了实践能动性的类似模型,根据该模型,主体的条件信念是原因响应的计划状态,它启动并维持心理行为,以便渲染控制。