Social media users often push back against harmful rhetoric with satirical and aggressive counterspeech. How do the interconnected race and gender identities of the person posting counterspeech and the person viewing it impact evaluations of the comment? Across two online experiments, we manipulate the race (Black or White) and gender (man or woman) of an individual whose tweet opposes ignorance about White privilege to examine if identity influences perceptions of incivility and intentions to flag the tweet for removal among Black and White men and women participants. Results demonstrate White men were most likely to find the tweet uncivil and report it, and this was especially the case when the tweet came from a Black woman, regardless of the tone. These studies highlight the importance of recognizing power and intersectionality in social media content moderation and creating policies that counteract the uniquely severe treatment of Black women by White men.

中文翻译：

---

种族和性别交织在一起：为什么交叉身份对社交媒体上的不文明行为和内容节制的看法很重要

社交媒体用户经常通过讽刺和攻击性的反驳言论来反击有害言论。发表反言论的人和观看反言论的人相互关联的种族和性别身份如何影响评论的评估？在两个在线实验中，我们操纵了一个人的种族（黑人或白人）和性别（男性或女性），该人的推文反对对白人特权的无知，以检查身份是否会影响对不文明行为的看法以及将推文标记为在黑人和白人中删除的意图。白人男性和女性参与者。结果表明，白人男性最有可能认为这条推文不文明并进行举报，尤其是当这条推文来自黑人女性时，无论语气如何，情况尤其如此。