So far, interest in policy and political sciences has mostly centered around the varieties of policy advisory systems (PASs) and knowledge regimes in consolidated democracies rather than in consolidated autocracies, which largely remain as black boxes. Drawing on a hybrid literature review, this article aims to fill this gap. It reviews selected articles published between 1992 and February 2023 in the Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge Social Science Citation Index database to not only to reveal the current state of empirical and theoretical knowledge and persistent knowledge gaps but also to offer an integration of the literature that leads to a preliminary conceptual framework in this emerging topic. In doing so, it contributes to the body of knowledge on this topic in three main ways. First, it provides a comprehensive review of PASs in consolidated autocracies to identify the central features of policy knowledge production within and across autocracies. Second, it proposes “the vicious circle of authoritarian PAS and knowledge regime” as a conceptual approach. In doing so, it takes a modest step toward a holistic conceptualization and synthesis of this literature to date. Third, it establishes connections between fragmented literature studies; identifies theoretical, conceptual, empirical, and methodological gaps; and proposes suggestions concerning promising paths for future research.

中文翻译：

---

综合威权政权中政策咨询体系和知识体系的恶性循环

到目前为止，人们对政策和政治科学的兴趣主要集中在巩固民主国家的各种政策咨询系统（PAS）和知识体系，而不是巩固独裁国家，后者在很大程度上仍然是黑匣子。本文旨在借鉴混合文献综述来填补这一空白。它回顾了汤森路透知识网社会科学引文索引数据库中 1992 年至 2023 年 2 月期间发表的精选文章，不仅揭示了经验和理论知识的现状以及持续存在的知识差距，而且还提供了引导文献的整合。这一新兴主题的初步概念框架。在此过程中，它通过三个主要方式为该主题的知识体系做出了贡献。第一的，它对联合独裁国家中的PAS进行了全面审查，以确定独裁国家内部和之间政策知识生产的核心特征。其次，它提出了“威权伊党和知识政权的恶性循环”作为一种概念方法。在此过程中，它朝着迄今为止这些文献的整体概念化和综合迈出了适度的一步。第三，在碎片化的文献研究之间建立联系；确定理论、概念、经验和方法上的差距；并就未来研究的有前景的路径提出建议。迄今为止，它朝着全面概念化和综合这些文献迈出了一步。第三，在碎片化的文献研究之间建立联系；确定理论、概念、经验和方法上的差距；并就未来研究的有前景的路径提出建议。迄今为止，它朝着全面概念化和综合这些文献迈出了一步。第三，在碎片化的文献研究之间建立联系；确定理论、概念、经验和方法上的差距；并就未来研究的有前景的路径提出建议。