当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
The International Journal of Art & Design Education
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Understanding Co-Design Practice as a Process of “Welldoing”
The International Journal of Art & Design Education ( IF 1.1 ) Pub Date : 2023-05-29 , DOI: 10.1111/jade.12459 Aaron Davis , Michelle Tuckey , Ian Gwilt , Niki Wallace
The International Journal of Art & Design Education ( IF 1.1 ) Pub Date : 2023-05-29 , DOI: 10.1111/jade.12459 Aaron Davis , Michelle Tuckey , Ian Gwilt , Niki Wallace
Co-design and other associated design approaches often deploy creative and making approaches in facilitating collaborative practices. In a therapeutic setting, engagement in creative and making activities have been associated with improvements in people's well-being, yet when deploying these as part of co-design practices, these outcomes are often overlooked. This paper presents the results from a series of workshops that focused on the well-being benefits of participating in co-design practices. The research uses Max-Neef's (1991). Theory of Needs to explore how innate human needs might be satisfied through participation in co-design practices, and demonstrates how this framework might be used for planning and evaluating co-design practices through a wellbeing lens. Finally, it suggests that future generations of design practitioners would benefit from exposure to the consideration of co-design as a process of “welldoing.”
中文翻译:
将协同设计实践理解为“行善”的过程
协同设计和其他相关设计方法通常采用创意和制作方法来促进协作实践。在治疗环境中,参与创意和制作活动与改善人们的福祉有关,但当将这些活动作为协同设计实践的一部分时,这些结果往往被忽视。本文介绍了一系列研讨会的结果,这些研讨会重点关注参与协同设计实践的福祉效益。该研究使用 Max-Neef (1991)。需求理论探索如何通过参与协同设计实践来满足人类的先天需求,并演示如何使用该框架通过福祉视角来规划和评估协同设计实践。最后,
更新日期:2023-05-29
中文翻译:
将协同设计实践理解为“行善”的过程
协同设计和其他相关设计方法通常采用创意和制作方法来促进协作实践。在治疗环境中,参与创意和制作活动与改善人们的福祉有关,但当将这些活动作为协同设计实践的一部分时,这些结果往往被忽视。本文介绍了一系列研讨会的结果,这些研讨会重点关注参与协同设计实践的福祉效益。该研究使用 Max-Neef (1991)。需求理论探索如何通过参与协同设计实践来满足人类的先天需求,并演示如何使用该框架通过福祉视角来规划和评估协同设计实践。最后,