背景
水稻被植物生长促进细菌(如甲基杆菌)定殖,导致互惠互利的植物-微生物相互作用。作为水稻发育过程的调节剂,甲基杆菌会影响种子的萌发、生长、健康和发育。然而,人们对调节微生物驱动的水稻发育的复杂分子响应机制知之甚少。蛋白质组学在水稻-微生物相互作用中的应用有助于我们阐明介导这种关联的动态蛋白质组学反应。
结果
在这项研究中,在所有处理中检测到总共 3908 种蛋白质,其中未接种的 IR29 和 FL478 共享高达 88% 的相似蛋白质。然而,内在差异出现在 IR29 和 FL478 中,这在差异丰富的蛋白质 (DAP) 及其相关基因本体论术语 (GO) 中很明显。M. oryzae的成功定植水稻中的 CBMB20 导致 IR29 和 FL478 蛋白质组的动态变化。IR29 中用于生物过程的 DAP 的 GO 术语从对刺激的反应、细胞氨基酸代谢过程、生物过程的调节和翻译转变为辅助因子代谢过程 (6.31%)、翻译 (5.41%) 和光合作用 (5.41%) . FL478 显示出从翻译相关到对刺激 (9%) 和有机酸代谢酸 (8%) 的反应的不同转变。由于接种M. oryzae CBMB20,两种水稻基因型也显示出 GO 术语的多样化。IR29 和 FL478 中上调的肽基-脯氨酰顺反异构酶 (A2WJU9)、硫胺素噻唑合酶 (A2YM28) 和丙氨酸-tRNA 连接酶 (B8B4H5) 等特定蛋白质表明米霉的关键机制CBMB20 介导的水稻植物生长促进作用。
结论
米甲基杆菌CBMB20 与水稻的相互作用导致动态的、相似的和植物基因型特异性的蛋白质组学变化,支持相关的生长和发育。多方面的 CBMB20 扩展了基因本体术语,增加了与光合作用、多种代谢过程、蛋白质合成和细胞分化以及可能归因于宿主植物生长发育的命运相关的蛋白质的丰度。特定蛋白质及其功能相关性有助于我们了解 CBMB20 如何在正常条件下介导宿主的生长和发育,并可能在宿主植物暴露于生物和非生物胁迫时将后续反应联系起来。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Microbe-Responsive Proteomes During Plant–Microbe Interactions Between Rice Genotypes and the Multifunctional Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20
Background
Rice is colonized by plant growth promoting bacteria such as Methylobacterium leading to mutually beneficial plant–microbe interactions. As modulators of the rice developmental process, Methylobacterium influences seed germination, growth, health, and development. However, little is known about the complex molecular responsive mechanisms modulating microbe-driven rice development. The application of proteomics to rice-microbe interactions helps us elucidate dynamic proteomic responses mediating this association.
Results
In this study, a total of 3908 proteins were detected across all treatments of which the non-inoculated IR29 and FL478 share up to 88% similar proteins. However, intrinsic differences appear in IR29 and FL478 as evident in the differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) and their associated gene ontology terms (GO). Successful colonization of M. oryzae CBMB20 in rice resulted to dynamic shifts in proteomes of both IR29 and FL478. The GO terms of DAPs for biological process in IR29 shifts in abundance from response to stimulus, cellular amino acid metabolic process, regulation of biological process and translation to cofactor metabolic process (6.31%), translation (5.41%) and photosynthesis (5.41%). FL478 showed a different shift from translation-related to response to stimulus (9%) and organic acid metabolic acid (8%). Both rice genotypes also showed a diversification of GO terms due to the inoculation of M. oryzae CBMB20. Specific proteins such as peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase (A2WJU9), thiamine thiazole synthase (A2YM28), and alanine—tRNA ligase (B8B4H5) upregulated in IR29 and FL478 indicate key mechanisms of M. oryzae CBMB20 mediated plant growth promotion in rice.
Conclusions
Interaction of Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20 to rice results in a dynamic, similar, and plant genotype-specific proteomic changes supporting associated growth and development. The multifaceted CBMB20 expands the gene ontology terms and increases the abundance of proteins associated with photosynthesis, diverse metabolic processes, protein synthesis and cell differentiation and fate potentially attributed to the growth and development of the host plant. The specific proteins and their functional relevance help us understand how CBMB20 mediate growth and development in their host under normal conditions and potentially link subsequent responses when the host plants are exposed to biotic and abiotic stresses.