Communication Monographs ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2023-04-20 , DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2023.2202749 Jessica Gasiorek 1 , Marko Dragojevic 2
ABSTRACT
Participants read English-based online texts from fictional organizations that either included no code-mixing, Hawaiian words without glosses (i.e., parenthetical translations), or Hawaiian words with English glosses. Relative to no code-mixing, code-mixing without glosses disrupted processing fluency, leading participants to feel less welcome in the organization. Code-mixing with glosses did not disrupt fluency for participants from Hawai‘i, where this practice is common, but did for people from elsewhere. No differences in feeling welcome emerged between code-mixing with glosses and no code-mixing conditions. These results suggest that code-mixing in written organizational materials can have both costs (i.e., disrupted fluency) and benefits (i.e., cueing inclusiveness), and that these effects depend on audiences’ familiarity with code-mixing as a practice, and the format of code-mixing.
中文翻译:
![](https://scdn.x-mol.com/jcss/images/paperTranslation.png)
书面代码混合对处理流畅性和组织包容性认知的影响
摘要
参与者阅读来自虚构组织的基于英语的在线文本,这些文本要么不包含代码混合,要么不包含注释的夏威夷语单词(即括号翻译),或者包含英语注释的夏威夷语单词。相对于没有代码混合,没有注释的代码混合会破坏处理的流畅性,导致参与者在组织中感觉不太受欢迎。对于来自夏威夷的参与者来说,带有注释的代码混合并没有影响流畅性,这种做法在夏威夷很常见,但对于来自其他地方的人来说却有影响。有注释的代码混合和无代码混合条件之间的受欢迎程度没有差异。这些结果表明,书面组织材料中的代码混合既有成本(即破坏流畅性)也有好处(即提示包容性),