Scholars consider the translatability and efficacy of “western” LGBT politics as they diffuse, but pay little attention to the role of its histories and cultures as geo-temporal phenomena. Focusing on Pride events, this article demonstrates how such oversights inhibit a full account of the widely diverse impacts of similar actions in different places. We explore the ways in which Pride events, as a mode of activism, go global and integrate in vastly different contexts: Serbia and Uganda. Paying particular attention to acts of violence and the instrumentalization of Pride as geopolitical, we argue that divergent outcomes connect to the diffusion of Pride as creative of geo-temporal dislocations of politics and history. Incorporating the concept of extraversion, we demonstrate that the intertwining of the domestic and international facilitates the transformation of politics in terms of foreseen outcomes and unintended consequences. Overall, we propose a framework that advances an understanding of homophobic and homophilic politics as instrumentalizations of geo-temporal dislocations that underpin the global fight for LGBT rights. As a challenge to the progress narrative nearly intrinsic to western international relations, this approach is useful to explore processes that shape other types of transnational politics, such as democracy, climate change, and peace movements.

中文翻译：

---

LGBT 政治的错位：乌干达和塞尔维亚的骄傲、全球化和地缘时间性

学者们考虑了“西方”LGBT 政治传播的可译性和有效性，但很少关注其历史和文化作为地时现象的作用。本文以骄傲事件为重点，展示了此类疏忽如何阻碍对不同地方类似行动的广泛不同影响的全面考虑。我们探索了骄傲活动作为一种激进主义模式如何走向全球并融入截然不同的环境：塞尔维亚和乌干达。我们特别关注暴力行为和骄傲作为地缘政治的工具化，我们认为不同的结果与骄傲的扩散有关，作为政治和历史的地时错位的创造性。结合外向性的概念，我们证明，就可预见的结果和意想不到的后果而言，国内和国际的交织有助于政治转型。总体而言，我们提出了一个框架，该框架可促进对恐同和嗜同政治的理解，将其视为支持全球 LGBT 权利斗争的地时错位的工具。作为对西方国际关系几乎固有的进步叙事的挑战，这种方法有助于探索塑造其他类型跨国政治的过程，例如民主、气候变化和和平运动。我们提出了一个框架，以促进对恐同和亲同政治的理解，将其视为支持全球 LGBT 权利斗争的地时错位的工具。作为对西方国际关系几乎固有的进步叙事的挑战，这种方法有助于探索塑造其他类型跨国政治的过程，例如民主、气候变化和和平运动。我们提出了一个框架，以促进对恐同和亲同政治的理解，将其视为支持全球 LGBT 权利斗争的地时错位的工具。作为对西方国际关系几乎固有的进步叙事的挑战，这种方法有助于探索塑造其他类型跨国政治的过程，例如民主、气候变化和和平运动。