In their recent article ‘Resolving Frege’s other Puzzle’ Eric Snyder, Richard Samuels, and Stewart Shapiro defend a semantic type-shifting solution to Frege’s other Puzzle and criticize my own cognitive type-shifting solution. In this article I respond to their criticism and in turn point to several problems with their preferred solution. In particular, I argue that they conflate semantic function and semantic value, and that their proposal is neither based on general semantic type-shifting principles nor adequate to the data.

中文翻译：

---

重新聚焦弗雷格的其他难题：对斯奈德、塞缪尔和夏皮罗的回应

在他们最近的文章“解决弗雷格的其他难题”中，埃里克·斯奈德、理查德·塞缪尔斯和斯图尔特·夏皮罗捍卫了弗雷格的其他难题的语义类型转换解决方案，并批评了我自己的认知类型转换解决方案。在这篇文章中，我回应了他们的批评，并反过来指出了他们首选解决方案的几个问题。特别是，我认为他们将语义功能和语义价值混为一谈，并且他们的提议既不基于一般的语义类型转换原则，也不适合数据。