The “temporary golden age” of international courts is likely over. States seeking to provide oversight mechanisms and individual remedies at the international level are likely to opt for less intrusive and more flexible alternatives to adjudication. This Article analyzes the phenomenon of international complaint mechanisms through a detailed case study of the Ombudsperson to the ISIL and Al-Qaida sanctions regime. The analysis reveals an in-built tension between principle and pragmatism: the Ombudsperson's institutional design falls short of the requirements that are essential for adjudication, but it nevertheless proves to be a surprisingly effective remedy for persons wrongfully listed. The Article makes the case for the establishment of such bodies, despite some of their inherent shortcomings.

中文翻译：

---

国际法裁决的替代方案：联合国安理会制裁伊黎伊斯兰国和基地组织制度监察员的个案研究

国际法庭的“暂时黄金时代”可能已经结束。寻求在国际层面提供监督机制和个别补救措施的国家可能会选择侵入性较小且更灵活的裁决替代方案。本文通过对伊黎伊斯兰国和基地组织制裁制度监察员的详细案例研究，分析了国际投诉机制的现象。分析揭示了原则与实用主义之间的内在张力：监察员的制度设计不符合裁决所必需的要求，但事实证明，它对被错误列名的人来说是一种令人惊讶的有效补救措施。尽管存在一些固有的缺点，但该条规定了建立此类机构的理由。