当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Studies Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Past, Present, and Future(s) of Feminist Foreign Policy
International Studies Review ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2023-01-23 , DOI: 10.1093/isr/viac068
Columba Achilleos-Sarll 1 , Jennifer Thomson 2 , Toni Haastrup 3 , Karoline Färber 4 , Carol Cohn 5 , Paul Kirby 6
Affiliation  

Almost a decade after Sweden first declared that it would follow a feminist foreign policy (FFP), a further eleven countries from across Europe, North and South America, and North and West Africa have adopted, or have signaled an interest in potentially adopting, an FFP in the future. These developments have been accompanied by a growing body of feminist scholarship. Although still in its infancy, this literature can generally be divided between more normative accounts and those that are empirically focused, with particular attention paid to the FFPs of Sweden and Canada. Yet, few studies compare FFPs’ uptake across different countries and regions, examine its connections to longer histories of ideas around women and gender, or unpack the policy intersections FFP (tentatively) engages. Contributing to these different areas, Part I provides an overview of the history of FFP, interrogates FFP in the context of Foreign Policy Analysis, and explores what FFP can achieve in the current (liberal) global system. Part II turns to consider policy intersections in relation to the climate crisis, migration, militarism, and bodies. Thinking through its origins, policy intersections, and potential future(s), the contributors to this Forum explore FFP's multiple and contested future(s). Ultimately, the Forum takes stock of this feminist turn in foreign policy at a critical point in its development and considers what future possibilities it may hold.

中文翻译:

女权主义外交政策的过去、现在和未来

在瑞典首次宣布将遵循女权主义外交政策 (FFP) 近十年后,来自欧洲、北美和南美以及北非和西非的另外 11 个国家已经采用或表示有兴趣可能采用,未来的FFP。这些发展伴随着越来越多的女权主义学术研究。虽然仍处于起步阶段,但这些文献通常可以分为更规范的说明和以经验为重点的说明,特别关注瑞典和加拿大的 FFP。然而,很少有研究比较 FFP 在不同国家和地区的采用情况,研究其与更长期的关于女性和性别的思想历史的联系,或揭示 FFP(暂时)参与的政策交叉点。为这些不同的领域做出贡献,第一部分概述了 FFP 的历史,在外交政策分析的背景下审视 FFP,并探讨 FFP 在当前(自由主义)全球体系中可以取得什么成就。第二部分转而考虑与气候危机、移民、军国主义和机构相关的政策交集。通过其起源、政策交叉点和潜在未来的思考,本论坛的贡献者探索了 FFP 的多重和有争议的未来。最终,论坛在其发展的关键时刻评估了外交政策中的女权主义转向,并考虑了它未来可能拥有的可能性。第二部分转而考虑与气候危机、移民、军国主义和机构相关的政策交集。通过其起源、政策交叉点和潜在未来的思考,本论坛的贡献者探索了 FFP 的多重和有争议的未来。最终,论坛在其发展的关键时刻评估了外交政策中的女权主义转向,并考虑了它未来可能拥有的可能性。第二部分转而考虑与气候危机、移民、军国主义和机构相关的政策交集。通过其起源、政策交叉点和潜在未来的思考,本论坛的贡献者探索了 FFP 的多重和有争议的未来。最终,论坛在其发展的关键时刻评估了外交政策中的女权主义转向,并考虑了它未来可能拥有的可能性。
更新日期:2023-01-23
down
wechat
bug