In Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, the Supreme Court rejected Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam’s challenge to the procedurally threadbare “expedited removal” he faced. The Court relied, in part, on the “entry fiction” — a doctrine under which certain physically present noncitizens are legally…

中文翻译：

---

三权分立与 Thuraissigiam：作为司法强化的入门虚构

在国土安全部诉 Thuraissigiam 案中，最高法院驳回了 Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam 对他所面临的程序陈旧的“快速遣返”提出的质疑。法院部分依赖于“进入虚构”——根据该学说，某些实际存在的非公民是合法的……