目的
腹腔镜和机器人腹股沟疝网片修复术都是世界范围内常见的外科手术。术后疝复发和血清肿形成是重要的问题。在腹疝中,腹腔镜手术中的原发性缺损闭合可降低复发率。然而,在微创手术中,没有直接腹股沟疝缺损闭合与非闭合的合成证据。因此,本研究调查了缺损闭合对接受微创直接腹股沟疝网修复术患者的疗效。
方法
通过检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 CINAHL 确定了从建库到 2022 年 3 月的合格研究。纳入了检查腹腔镜直接腹股沟疝修补术中缺损闭合的研究,并使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。通过一次删除一项研究来进行敏感性分析。主要结局是疝复发和血清瘤形成。术后急性和慢性疼痛、手术时间和住院时间是次要结局。
结果
纳入 5 项非随机研究和 1 项随机对照试验。汇总分析显示,缺损闭合可能会降低疝复发率(风险差,-0.02;95% 置信区间 [CI] -0.04 至 -0.00;p = 0.02)。血清肿形成的结果(比值比,0.49;95% CI 0.17-1.46;p = 0.20) 显示无显著差异。此外,在术后急性疼痛、慢性疼痛、住院时间和手术时间方面未观察到显著差异。
结论
我们的研究表明,缺损闭合似乎是降低直接腹股沟疝复发率的一种选择。在血清肿形成和其他次要结局方面没有显示显著益处。我们的研究主要基于非随机研究,低估了缺损闭合的效果;因此,需要进一步的高质量研究来得出明确的结论。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Fascia defect closure versus non-closure in minimal invasive direct inguinal hernia mesh repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence
Purpose
Laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia mesh repair are both common surgical procedures worldwide. Postoperative hernia recurrence and seroma formation are important concerns. In ventral hernia, primary defect closure in laparoscopic surgery reduces the recurrence rate. However, there is no synthetic evidence of direct inguinal hernia defect closure versus non-closure in minimal invasive surgery. Therefore, this study investigated the efficacy of defect closure in patients undergoing minimal invasive direct inguinal hernia mesh repair.
Methods
Eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from their inception until March 2022. Studies examining defect closure in laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair were included, and a meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model. Sensitivity analyses were performed by removing one study at a time. The primary outcomes were hernia recurrence and seroma formation. Acute and chronic postoperative pain, operation time, and length of hospital stay were the secondary outcomes.
Results
Five nonrandomized studies and one randomized controlled trial were included. Pooled analysis revealed defect closure might reduce the hernia recurrence rate (risk difference, − 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.04 to − 0.00; p = 0.02). The result of seroma formation (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI 0.17–1.46; p = 0.20) showed no significant difference. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in acute postoperative pain, chronic pain, length of hospital stay, and operation time.
Conclusions
Our study indicated defect closure seems to be an option to reduce the direct inguinal hernia recurrence rate. No significant benefits were shown in seroma formation and other secondary outcomes. Our study was mostly based on nonrandomized studies and underestimated the effect of defect closure; thus, further high-quality studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.