当前位置: X-MOL 学术Appl. Energy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Carbon capture and liquefaction from methane steam reforming unit: 4E’s analysis (Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental)
Applied Energy ( IF 10.1 ) Pub Date : 2022-12-26 , DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120545
Changgwon Choe , Junaid Haider , Hankwon Lim

Excessive fossil–fuel consumption to meet increased energy demand is considered as the main reason of the climatic change. To prevent this devastating change, hydrogen has gained much attention as an intermediate to replace fossil–fuel–based energy systems by sustainable green energy system. Since most of the H2 is produced through natural gas process, a trade–off in terms of huge amounts of CO2 emissions should be concerned. Accordingly, integration of the H2 production and carbon capture facility actively, called blue H2, emerges as a workable alternative. In addition, with the rise in CO2 demand, the liquefaction of captured CO2 has become an attractive strategy in terms of long–term storage and transportation. Therefore, a comprehensive study is performed to assess the feasibility of an integrated system based on carbon capture using monoethanol amine and four CO2 liquefaction systems such as Linde-Hampson, dual pressure Linde-Hampson, vapor compression refrigerant, and absorption refrigerant systems (later will use as case 1 to 4, respectively). Based on energy and exergy evaluations, case 4 reflects the higher efficiencies with specific energy consumption of 0.188el and 0.733th GJ ton CO2-1 and exergy efficiency of 85.55 %. In addition, techno-economic analysis calculates unit LCO2 production of each case; 22.19, 21.35, 21.00, and 24.60 $ ton-1 for cases 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The quantified climate change impacts were estimated by life-cycle assessment; 0.629, 0.620, 0.608. and 0.674 kg CO2-eq kg LCO2-1 for cases 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Furthermore, analytic hierarchy process is performed to provide comprehensive guidelines of liquefied CO2 production under technical, economic, and environmental aspects.



中文翻译:

甲烷蒸汽重整装置的碳捕获和液化:4E 的分析(能源、火用、经济和环境)

为满足不断增长的能源需求而过度消耗化石燃料被认为是气候变化的主要原因。为了防止这种破坏性的变化,氢作为一种中间体,通过可持续的绿色能源系统取代基于化石燃料的能源系统而受到广泛关注。由于大部分 H 2是通过天然气工艺生产的,因此应该考虑在大量 CO 2排放方面的权衡。因此,积极整合 H 2生产和碳捕获设施,称为 blue H 2,成为一种可行的替代方案。此外,随着 CO 2需求的增加,捕获的 CO 2液化就长期储存和运输而言,已成为一种有吸引力的策略。因此,进行了一项综合研究,以评估基于使用单乙醇胺和四种 CO 2液化系统(如 Linde-Hampson、双压力 Linde-Hampson、蒸汽压缩制冷剂和吸收制冷剂系统(后来)的碳捕获的集成系统的可行性将分别用作情况 1 至 4)。基于能量和火用评估,案例 4 反映出更高的效率,单位能耗为 0.188 el和 0.733th GJ ton CO 2 -1以及火用效率为 85.55%。此外,技术经济分析计算单位 LCO 2每个案例的制作;案例 1、2、3 和 4 分别为22.19、21.35、21.00 和 24.60 $ ton -1 。通过生命周期评估估算了量化的气候变化影响;0.629、0.620、0.608。和 0.674 kg CO 2 -eq kg LCO 2 -1对于情况 1、2、3 和 4,分别。此外,执行层次分析法以在技术、经济和环境方面提供液化 CO 2生产的综合指南。

更新日期:2022-12-26
down
wechat
bug