Major power projects are normally critical nodes of the national power producing and transmission networks. However, the management of major power projects faces a variety of difficulties such as large scale, technical complexity, high quality standard, and frequent coordination. To improve the scientificity and effectiveness of the construction management of major power projects, a comprehensive framework of major power projects is established, which can be further decomposed into 8 subsystems and 28 indicators through system thinking. Then, by combining the G1 method with the cloud model, a new way of management performance evaluation of power projects is provided. Finally, taking the Kunliulong DC demonstration project as a case, the total performance evaluation result using the cloud model is between “excellent” and “great,” and more inclined to “excellent,” the performance of Schedule Control is close to the “outstanding” level, while the performance of Project Breakdown Structure is reaching the “good” level. The result shows that the established management evaluation system of major power engineering is relatively comprehensive, which can provide a reference for the realization of multiobjective and full-cycle overall management. Meanwhile, the exposed weak links in management, such as structural decomposition and environmental protection, should be highly valued and strictly controlled.

中文翻译：

---

基于系统思维的重大电力项目管理综合框架

大型电力项目通常是国家电力生产和输电网络的关键节点。然而，重大电力项目的管理面临着规模大、技术复杂、质量标准高、协调频繁等多种困难。为提高重大电力工程建设管理的科学性和有效性，建立了重大电力工程综合框架，通过系统思维进一步分解为8个子系统、28个指标。然后，将G1方法与云模型相结合，提供了一种新的电力项目管理绩效评价方法。最后，以昆六龙直流示范项目为例，云模型综合性能评价结果介于“优秀”和“优秀”之间，”，更倾向于“优秀”，进度控制绩效接近“优秀”水平，项目分解结构绩效接近“良好”水平。结果表明，所建立的重大电力工程管理评价体系较为完备，可为实现多目标、全周期统筹管理提供参考。同时，要高度重视和严格控制结构分解、环境保护等管理中暴露出来的薄弱环节。结果表明，所建立的重大电力工程管理评价体系较为完备，可为实现多目标、全周期统筹管理提供参考。同时，要高度重视和严格控制结构分解、环境保护等管理中暴露出来的薄弱环节。结果表明，所建立的重大电力工程管理评价体系较为完备，可为实现多目标、全周期统筹管理提供参考。同时，要高度重视和严格控制结构分解、环境保护等管理中暴露出来的薄弱环节。