苯、甲苯和甲基叔丁基醚 (MTBE) 等燃料成分是地下水资源中经常检测到的污染物。活性炭异地修复技术已用于处理多年。然而,由于这些技术成本高,使用液态碳吸附剂原位修复受污染地下水的方法受到了更多关注。文献检索表明,关于使用液态吸附剂去除此类污染物的研究有限。因此,这项实验室规模的研究调查了使用原始生物炭基液体活性炭和铁改性生物炭基液体活性炭去除这些污染物的能力。合成液体活性炭和铁改性液体活性炭与沙子,石灰石混合的吸附效率,和 1:1 的沙子/石灰石混合物,使用批量悬浮实验进行了测试。还研究了颗粒活性炭的吸附,以与液体活性炭进行比较。研究结果表明,在地下材料上混合液态活性炭或 LAC-Fe 并未提高 MTBE 的去除效率。同时,对苯和甲苯的吸附效率略有提高。在所有情况下,GAC 的去除率更高,MTBE 和 BT 的去除率分别约为 80% 和 90%。结果还表明,液态活性炭和铁改性液态活性炭可以更好地去除苯和甲苯(还研究了颗粒活性炭的吸附,以与液体活性炭进行比较。研究结果表明,在地下材料上混合液态活性炭或 LAC-Fe 并未提高 MTBE 的去除效率。同时,对苯和甲苯的吸附效率略有提高。在所有情况下,GAC 的去除率更高,MTBE 和 BT 的去除率分别约为 80% 和 90%。结果还表明,液态活性炭和铁改性液态活性炭可以更好地去除苯和甲苯(还研究了颗粒活性炭的吸附,以与液体活性炭进行比较。研究结果表明,在地下材料上混合液态活性炭或 LAC-Fe 并未提高 MTBE 的去除效率。同时,对苯和甲苯的吸附效率略有提高。在所有情况下,GAC 的去除率更高,MTBE 和 BT 的去除率分别约为 80% 和 90%。结果还表明,液态活性炭和铁改性液态活性炭可以更好地去除苯和甲苯(在所有情况下,GAC 的去除率更高,MTBE 和 BT 的去除率分别约为 80% 和 90%。结果还表明,液态活性炭和铁改性液态活性炭可以更好地去除苯和甲苯(在所有情况下,GAC 的去除率更高,MTBE 和 BT 的去除率分别约为 80% 和 90%。结果还表明,液态活性炭和铁改性液态活性炭可以更好地去除苯和甲苯(∼ 40%) 高于 MTBE ( ∼ 20%)。还发现,在研究条件下,水化学(即盐度和 pH 值)对污染物的去除效率影响不大。可以得出结论,需要更多的研究来提高基于生物炭的液体活性炭去除 MTBE、苯和甲苯化合物的能力,这将导致提高液体活性炭在受污染地下水原位修复中的利用率。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Removal of benzene, MTBE and toluene from contaminated waters using biochar-based liquid activated carbon
Fuel components such as benzene, toluene, and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) are frequently detected pollutants in groundwater resources. Ex-situ remediation technologies by activated carbon have been used for treatment for many years. However, due to high cost of these technology, more attention has been given to the in-situ remediation methods of contaminated groundwaters using liquid carbon adsorbents. Literature search showed limited studies on using adsorbents in liquid form for the removal of such contaminants. Therefore, this lab-scale study investigates the capacity of using raw biochar-based liquid activated carbon and iron-modified biochar-based liquid activated carbon to remove these pollutants. The adsorption efficiency of the synthesized liquid activated carbon and iron-modified liquid activated carbon mixed with sand, limestone, and 1:1 mixture of sand/limestone, was tested using batch suspension experiments. Adsorption by granular activated carbon was also investigated for comparison with liquid activated carbon. Results of the study revealed that mixing of liquid activated carbon or LAC-Fe on subsurface materials had not improved the removal efficiency of MTBE. At the same time, it showed a slight improvement in the adsorption efficiency of benzene and toluene. In all cases, the removal by GAC was higher with around 80% and 90% for MTBE and BT, respectively. Results also showed that benzene and toluene were better removed by liquid activated carbon and iron-modified liquid activated carbon (∼ 40%) than MTBE (∼ 20%). It is also found that water chemistry (i.e., salinity and pH) had insignificant effects on the removal efficiency of pollutants under the study conditions. It can be concluded that more research is needed to improve the capacity of biochar-based liquid-activated carbon in removing MTBE, benzene and toluene compounds that will lead to improve the utilization of liquid activated carbon for the in-situ remediation of contaminated groundwaters.