当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Philosophical Issues
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Group-deliberative competences and group knowledge
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-10-26 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12217 Fernando Broncano‐Berrocal 1 , Moisés Barba 2
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-10-26 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12217 Fernando Broncano‐Berrocal 1 , Moisés Barba 2
Affiliation
Under what conditions is a group belief resulting from deliberation constitutive of group knowledge? What kinds of competences must a deliberating group manifest when settling a question so that the resulting collective belief can be considered group knowledge? In this paper, we provide an answer to the second question that helps make progress on the first question. In particular, we explain the epistemic normativity of deliberation-based group belief in terms of a truth norm and an evidential norm, introduce a virtue-reliabilist condition on deliberative group knowledge, and provide an account and a taxonomy of the types of group competences that are necessary for this type of collective knowledge.
中文翻译:
群体协商能力和群体知识
在什么条件下,由商议产生的群体信念构成群体知识?在解决问题时,一个审议小组必须表现出什么样的能力,以便由此产生的集体信念可以被视为小组知识?在本文中,我们提供了第二个问题的答案,这有助于在第一个问题上取得进展。特别是,我们用真理规范和证据规范来解释基于商议的群体信念的认知规范性,引入商议群体知识的美德可靠性条件,并提供群体能力类型的说明和分类是这种集体知识所必需的。
更新日期:2022-10-26
中文翻译:
群体协商能力和群体知识
在什么条件下,由商议产生的群体信念构成群体知识?在解决问题时,一个审议小组必须表现出什么样的能力,以便由此产生的集体信念可以被视为小组知识?在本文中,我们提供了第二个问题的答案,这有助于在第一个问题上取得进展。特别是,我们用真理规范和证据规范来解释基于商议的群体信念的认知规范性,引入商议群体知识的美德可靠性条件,并提供群体能力类型的说明和分类是这种集体知识所必需的。