当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Philosophical Issues
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Collective practical knowledge is a fragmented interrogative capacity
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-10-26 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12219 Joshua Habgood‐Coote 1
Philosophical Issues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-10-26 , DOI: 10.1111/phis.12219 Joshua Habgood‐Coote 1
Affiliation
What does it take for a group of people to know how to do something? An account of collective practical knowledge ought to be compatible with the linguistic evidence about the semantics for collective knowledge-how ascriptions, be able to explain the practicality of collective knowledge, be able to explain both the connection between individual and collective know-how and the possibility of a group knowing how to do something none of its members know, and be applicable to a suitably wide range of groups. In this paper I develop a view which can meet all of these desiderata, which combines a Fragmented account of collective knowledge (Habgood-Coote, 2019a), with the view that practical knowledge is an Interrogative Capacity (Habgood-Coote, 2019b).
中文翻译:
集体实践知识是一种碎片化的提问能力
一群人知道如何做某事需要什么?对集体实践知识的描述应该与关于集体知识-如何归属的语义的语言学证据兼容,能够解释集体知识的实用性,能够解释个人和集体知识之间的联系以及一个群体知道如何做其成员都不知道的事情的可能性,并且适用于适当广泛的群体。在本文中,我提出了一种可以满足所有这些需求的观点,它结合了集体知识的碎片化描述(Habgood-Coote,2019a),并认为实践知识是一种提问能力(Habgood-Coote,2019b)。
更新日期:2022-10-26
中文翻译:
集体实践知识是一种碎片化的提问能力
一群人知道如何做某事需要什么?对集体实践知识的描述应该与关于集体知识-如何归属的语义的语言学证据兼容,能够解释集体知识的实用性,能够解释个人和集体知识之间的联系以及一个群体知道如何做其成员都不知道的事情的可能性,并且适用于适当广泛的群体。在本文中,我提出了一种可以满足所有这些需求的观点,它结合了集体知识的碎片化描述(Habgood-Coote,2019a),并认为实践知识是一种提问能力(Habgood-Coote,2019b)。