ABSTRACT

Based on the work of Martindale, R. J., Collins, D., and Daubney, J. (2005, Talent development: A guide for practice and research within sport. Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich ), 57(4), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2005.10491862) and Henriksen, K., Stambulova, N., and Roessler, K. K. (2010a, Holistic approach to athletic talent development environments: A successful sailing milieu. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.10.005), researchers have increasingly focused on environmental features influencing talent development in sport from an integrated, holistic perspective. These contributions led to a quickly evolving body of literature and a proliferation of findings related to facilitative and debilitative environmental features. With a timely appraisal of this work warranted, this review aims to coalesce salient results from talent development environment research. For this purpose, a holistic perspective is employed on (a) the environmental level, by considering the sport and non-sport domain and by identifying functional and dysfunctional features, as well as on (b) the outcome level, by considering wellbeing and personal development, alongside athletic development, as important athlete-related outcomes. Following a systematic search, 44 articles were identified and findings summarised by conducting a directed content analysis (Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687). Several functional and dysfunctional features were derived from the literature and grouped into the following main categories within a preliminary conceptual framework: Preconditions of the Sport Environment, Organisational Culture, Integration of Efforts, and Holistic Quality Preparation. The framework’s contribution to a more systemic and holistic approach to talent development is discussed and critical future research directions are proposed.

摘要

基于 Martindale, RJ、Collins, D. 和 Daubney, J. (2005, Talent development: A guide for practice and research in sport. Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich) , 57 (4), 353–375 . https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2005.10491862）和 Henriksen, K.、Stambulova, N. 和 Roessler, KK（2010a，运动人才发展环境的整体方法：成功的帆船环境。运动心理学和运动, 11(3), 212–222。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.10.005），研究人员越来越多地从综合、整体的角度关注影响体育人才发展的环境特征。这些贡献导致了迅速发展的文献体系以及与促进性和衰弱性环境特征相关的研究结果的激增。由于有必要对这项工作进行及时评估，本次审查旨在整合人才发展环境研究的显着成果。为此，在 (a) 环境层面，通过考虑运动和非运动领域，并通过识别功能和功能失调的特征，以及在 (b) 结果层面，通过考虑福祉和个人发展，连同运动发展，作为与运动员相关的重要成果。定性健康研究，15 (9)，1277–1288。https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687）。一些功能性和功能失调的特征来自文献，并在初步概念框架内分为以下主要类别：体育环境的先决条件、组织文化、努力的整合和整体质量准备。讨论了该框架对更系统和全面的人才发展方法的贡献，并提出了关键的未来研究方向。