当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
European History Quarterly
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
‘Living Normally’: Everyday Life Under Salazarism
European History Quarterly ( IF 0.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-03-30 , DOI: 10.1177/02656914221085129 Daniel Melo 1
European History Quarterly ( IF 0.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-03-30 , DOI: 10.1177/02656914221085129 Daniel Melo 1
Affiliation
In this article we propose a problematizing overview of daily life under the Salazarist dictatorship (1926–1974), linking the corporative, educational and propagandistic contexts. We examine how institutionalized, controlled, negotiated and/or repressed leisure was spread throughout the smallest interstices of daily life in Portugal. We also analyse the dichotomous realities and policies for the people and elites (in education and reading, cultural production, circulation and consumption), for women and men (social and cultural roles), etc., and compromises with an expanded mass culture. The article directs attention to specific examples of sociocultural negotiations between civil society and the state, as happened in sports (para-)folkloristic festivities and parades (e.g. the ‘popular marches’) and in certain mass culture productions (e.g. revue theatre, cinema, broadcasting and television). Similarly, our ‘bottom-up’ approach focuses on evidence of subversive or alternative sociability and cultural achievements, demonstrating that, in some areas, elements of civil society were able to express open resistance and/or alternative views to the dictatorship.
中文翻译:
“正常生活”:萨拉查主义下的日常生活
在这篇文章中,我们提出了对萨拉查主义独裁统治(1926-1974)下日常生活的问题化概述,将企业、教育和宣传背景联系起来。我们研究了制度化、控制、协商和/或压制的休闲是如何在葡萄牙日常生活中最小的空隙中传播的。我们还分析了人民和精英(教育和阅读、文化生产、流通和消费)、女性和男性(社会和文化角色)等的二元现实和政策,并与扩大的大众文化妥协。本文关注公民社会与国家之间社会文化谈判的具体例子,如体育(准)民俗庆祝活动和游行(例如“流行游行”)和某些大众文化作品(例如 评论剧院,电影,广播和电视)。同样,我们的“自下而上”方法侧重于颠覆性或替代性社交能力和文化成就的证据,表明在某些领域,公民社会的成员能够对独裁政权表达公开的抵抗和/或替代观点。
更新日期:2022-03-30
中文翻译:
“正常生活”:萨拉查主义下的日常生活
在这篇文章中,我们提出了对萨拉查主义独裁统治(1926-1974)下日常生活的问题化概述,将企业、教育和宣传背景联系起来。我们研究了制度化、控制、协商和/或压制的休闲是如何在葡萄牙日常生活中最小的空隙中传播的。我们还分析了人民和精英(教育和阅读、文化生产、流通和消费)、女性和男性(社会和文化角色)等的二元现实和政策,并与扩大的大众文化妥协。本文关注公民社会与国家之间社会文化谈判的具体例子,如体育(准)民俗庆祝活动和游行(例如“流行游行”)和某些大众文化作品(例如 评论剧院,电影,广播和电视)。同样,我们的“自下而上”方法侧重于颠覆性或替代性社交能力和文化成就的证据,表明在某些领域,公民社会的成员能够对独裁政权表达公开的抵抗和/或替代观点。