jects are likely to prevent such transformation; they operate as brinkmanship to safeguard that whatever happens with the global ecosystem will not lead to the loss of control over resources by those in governing positions. No doubt, technological innovations are positive. No doubt, soft norms and accountability proceedings will alleviate the most immediate problems, perhaps even for a long time. In its governance format as offered in this course, however, international law may remain unable to engage those students who have travelled longest to get to The Hague in order to find out what kind of change is needed in global institutions so that the values they mostly already share could finally be labeled “common.”

中文翻译：

---

牛津全球法律多元化手册。由保罗·希夫·伯曼编辑。纽约：牛津大学出版社，2020 年。xiii, 1051. 索引。

项目可能会阻止这种转变；它们以边缘政策的方式运作，以确保全球生态系统发生的任何事情都不会导致执政者失去对资源的控制权。毫无疑问，技术创新是积极的。毫无疑问，软规范和问责程序将缓解最紧迫的问题，甚至可能持续很长时间。然而，在本课程提供的治理形式中，国际法可能仍然无法吸引那些前往海牙旅行时间最长的学生，以了解全球机构需要进行什么样的变革，以使他们最重视的价值观已经共享最终可以被标记为“普通”。