当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Br. J. Philos. Sci.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Distributive Epistemic Justice in Science
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2024-03-27 , DOI: 10.1086/715351 Gürol Irzik , Faik Kurtulmus
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2024-03-27 , DOI: 10.1086/715351 Gürol Irzik , Faik Kurtulmus
This article develops an account of distributive epistemic justice in the production of scientific knowledge. We identify four requirements: (a) science should produce the knowledge citizens need in order to reason about the common good, their individual good, and the pursuit thereof; (b) science should produce the knowledge those serving the public need to pursue justice effectively; (c) science should be organized in such a way that it does not aid the wilful manufacturing of ignorance; and (d) when making decisions about epistemic risks, scientists should make sure that there aren’t social groups or weighty interests that are neglected. After discussing these requirements, we examine the relationship between discriminatory and distributive epistemic injustice in science and argue that they often compound each other.
中文翻译:
科学中的分配认知正义
本文阐述了科学知识生产中的分配认知正义。我们确定了四个要求:(a)科学应该产生公民所需的知识,以便推理公共利益、个人利益及其追求; (b) 科学应当产生服务于公众有效伸张正义所需的知识; (c) 科学的组织方式不应助长故意制造无知; (d) 在做出有关认知风险的决策时,科学家应确保没有社会群体或重大利益被忽视。在讨论这些要求之后,我们研究了科学中的歧视性和分配性认知不公正之间的关系,并认为它们经常相互混合。
更新日期:2024-03-28
中文翻译:
科学中的分配认知正义
本文阐述了科学知识生产中的分配认知正义。我们确定了四个要求:(a)科学应该产生公民所需的知识,以便推理公共利益、个人利益及其追求; (b) 科学应当产生服务于公众有效伸张正义所需的知识; (c) 科学的组织方式不应助长故意制造无知; (d) 在做出有关认知风险的决策时,科学家应确保没有社会群体或重大利益被忽视。在讨论这些要求之后,我们研究了科学中的歧视性和分配性认知不公正之间的关系,并认为它们经常相互混合。