目的Orteronel (TAK-700) 是一种非甾体 17,20-裂合酶抑制剂,抑制雄激素合成。我们评估了奥特罗奈联合雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)治疗新诊断的转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者的临床益处。
方法在这项开放标签随机 III 期研究中,转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配至奥特罗奈 ADT(300 毫克口服,每日两次;实验组)或比卡鲁胺 ADT(50 毫克口服,每日一次;对照)手臂)。主要目标是比较总生存期 (OS),目标是将中位生存期提高 33%。单边P ≤ 0.022 的分层对数秩检验将表明统计显着性。次要终点是无进展生存期 (PFS)、7 个月时前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 水平(≤ 0.2 v 0.2 至 ≤ 4 v > 4 ng/mL)和不良事件概况。
结果在分析中纳入的 1,279 名患者中,638 名患者被随机分配至 ADT 加奥特罗奈组,641 名患者被随机分配至对照组。中位年龄为 68 岁;49% 患有广泛疾病。中位随访 4.9 年后,PFS(中位 47.6 个月与23.0 个月,风险比 0.58;95% CI,0.51 至 0.67;P < .0001)和 7 个月时 PSA 反应显着改善(P < .0001),但 OS 则不然(中位数 81.1 个月与70.2 个月,风险比 0.86;95% CI,0.72 至 1.02;P = 0.040,单侧)。与对照组相比,实验组发生了更多 3/4 级不良事件(43%对14%)。对照组中 77.4% 的患者和奥特罗奈组中 61.3% 的患者接受了方案后延长生命治疗。
结论该研究未达到奥特罗奈改善 OS 的主要终点。PFS 和 PSA 反应与 OS 缺乏相关性,引发了人们对在这种情况下广泛的方案后治疗背景下它们始终替代 OS 的假设的担忧。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Orteronel for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Trial (SWOG-1216)
PURPOSEOrteronel (TAK-700) is a nonsteroidal 17,20-lyase inhibitor suppressing androgen synthesis. We evaluated the clinical benefit of orteronel when added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
METHODSIn this open-label randomized phase III study, patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to ADT with orteronel (300 mg oral twice daily; experimental arm) or ADT with bicalutamide (50 mg oral once daily; control arm). The primary objective was the comparison of overall survival (OS), targeting a 33% improvement in median survival. A stratified log-rank test with a one-sided P ≤ .022 would indicate statistical significance. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at 7 months (≤ 0.2 v 0.2 to ≤ 4 v > 4 ng/mL), and adverse event profile.
RESULTSAmong 1,279 patients included in the analysis, 638 were randomly assigned to the ADT plus orteronel arm and 641 to the control arm. The median age was 68 years; 49% had extensive disease. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, there was a significant improvement in PFS (median 47.6 v 23.0 months, hazard ratio 0.58; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.67; P < .0001) and PSA response at 7 months (P < .0001), but not in OS (median 81.1 v 70.2 months, hazard ratio 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; P = .040, one-sided). More grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in the experimental versus the control arms (43% v 14%). Postprotocol life-prolonging therapy was received by 77.4% of patients in the control arm and 61.3% of patients in the orteronel arm.
CONCLUSIONThe study did not meet the primary end point of improved OS with orteronel. The lack of correlation of PFS and PSA response with OS raises concerns over assumption of their consistent surrogacy for OS in the context of extensive postprotocol therapy in this setting.