目的
Orteronel (TAK-700) 是一种非甾体 17,20-裂解酶抑制剂,可抑制雄激素合成。我们评估了奥特罗内尔联合雄激素剥夺疗法 (ADT) 对新诊断的转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者的临床益处。
方法
在这项开放标签随机 III 期研究中,转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者被 1:1 随机分配到 ADT 联合奥特罗尼(300 mg 口服,每日两次;实验组)或 ADT 联合比卡鲁胺(50 mg 口服,每日一次;对照组)。主要目标是比较总生存期 (OS),目标是将中位生存期提高 33%。单侧 P ≤ .022 的分层对数秩检验表示统计显著性。次要终点是无进展生存期 (PFS) 、 7 个月时前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 水平 (≤ 0.2 v 0.2 至 ≤ 4 v > 4 ng/mL) 和不良事件概况。
结果
在纳入分析的 1,279 名患者中,638 名被随机分配到 ADT 加 orteronel 组,641 名被随机分配到对照组。中位年龄为 68 岁;49% 患有广泛性疾病。中位随访 4.9 年后,PFS 显著改善(中位 47.6 v 23.0 个月,风险比 0.58;95% CI,0.51 至 0.67;P < .0001)和 7 个月时 PSA 反应 (P < .0001),但在 OS 中没有 (中位 81.1 v 70.2 个月,风险比 0.86;95% CI,0.72 至 1.02;P = .040,单侧)。与对照组相比,实验组发生了更多的 3/4 级不良事件 (43% v 14%)。对照组 77.4% 的患者和 orteronel 组 61.3% 的患者接受了方案后延长生命的治疗。
结论
该研究未达到 orteronel 改善 OS 的主要终点。PFS 和 PSA 反应与 OS 缺乏相关性,这引起了人们对在这种情况下广泛的方案后治疗背景下假设它们一致替代 OS 的担忧。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Orteronel for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Trial (SWOG-1216)
PURPOSEOrteronel (TAK-700) is a nonsteroidal 17,20-lyase inhibitor suppressing androgen synthesis. We evaluated the clinical benefit of orteronel when added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
METHODSIn this open-label randomized phase III study, patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to ADT with orteronel (300 mg oral twice daily; experimental arm) or ADT with bicalutamide (50 mg oral once daily; control arm). The primary objective was the comparison of overall survival (OS), targeting a 33% improvement in median survival. A stratified log-rank test with a one-sided P ≤ .022 would indicate statistical significance. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at 7 months (≤ 0.2 v 0.2 to ≤ 4 v > 4 ng/mL), and adverse event profile.
RESULTSAmong 1,279 patients included in the analysis, 638 were randomly assigned to the ADT plus orteronel arm and 641 to the control arm. The median age was 68 years; 49% had extensive disease. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, there was a significant improvement in PFS (median 47.6 v 23.0 months, hazard ratio 0.58; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.67; P < .0001) and PSA response at 7 months (P < .0001), but not in OS (median 81.1 v 70.2 months, hazard ratio 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; P = .040, one-sided). More grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in the experimental versus the control arms (43% v 14%). Postprotocol life-prolonging therapy was received by 77.4% of patients in the control arm and 61.3% of patients in the orteronel arm.
CONCLUSIONThe study did not meet the primary end point of improved OS with orteronel. The lack of correlation of PFS and PSA response with OS raises concerns over assumption of their consistent surrogacy for OS in the context of extensive postprotocol therapy in this setting.