当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
American Criminal Law Review
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Gamesmanship and Criminal Process
American Criminal Law Review Pub Date : 2021-12-01 John D. King
American Criminal Law Review Pub Date : 2021-12-01 John D. King
We first learn formal structures of rules, procedures, and norms of conduct through games and sports. These lessons illuminate and inform human behavior in other contexts, including the adversarial world of criminal litigation. As critiques of the legitimacy and fairness of the criminal justice system increase, the philosophy and jurisprudence of sport offer a comparative legal system to examine criminal litigation. Allegations of gamesmanship—the aggressive and strategic use of rules that violate some sense of decorum or culture yet remain within the formal rules of engagement—cut across both contexts. This Article examines what sports can teach us about gamesmanship in criminal litigation.
中文翻译:
游戏技巧和刑事程序
我们首先通过游戏和运动来学习规则、程序和行为规范的正式结构。这些经验教训阐明并告知其他情况下的人类行为,包括刑事诉讼的对抗性世界。随着对刑事司法系统合法性和公平性的批评越来越多,体育哲学和法理学为审查刑事诉讼提供了比较法律体系。对游戏技巧的指控——对规则的侵略性和战略性使用,违反了某种礼仪或文化,但仍在正式的交战规则范围内——跨越两种情况。本文探讨了体育可以教会我们什么关于刑事诉讼中的游戏技巧。
更新日期:2021-12-01
中文翻译:
游戏技巧和刑事程序
我们首先通过游戏和运动来学习规则、程序和行为规范的正式结构。这些经验教训阐明并告知其他情况下的人类行为,包括刑事诉讼的对抗性世界。随着对刑事司法系统合法性和公平性的批评越来越多,体育哲学和法理学为审查刑事诉讼提供了比较法律体系。对游戏技巧的指控——对规则的侵略性和战略性使用,违反了某种礼仪或文化,但仍在正式的交战规则范围内——跨越两种情况。本文探讨了体育可以教会我们什么关于刑事诉讼中的游戏技巧。