当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
American Criminal Law Review
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Imperial Prosecutor?
American Criminal Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Brian Richardson
American Criminal Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Brian Richardson
Federal prosecutors’ authority in the U.S. legal system is imperial. When they act, prosecutors speak for the whole of the U.S. government across all policy-making domains. Ideally, their judgments, expressed in many thousands of retail investigative and prosecutive decisions each year, are meant to be insulated from the interests of other Executive Branch actors—even, on many accounts, from the White House. The relevant ideal is expressed not principally as an injunction against self-dealing or “political” influence, but rather as the far broader norm of prosecutorial independence.
中文翻译:
帝国检察官?
联邦检察官在美国法律体系中的权力是帝国的。当他们采取行动时,检察官在所有决策领域代表整个美国政府发言。理想情况下,他们的判断,在每年数以千计的零售调查和起诉决定中表达出来,旨在与其他行政部门参与者的利益隔离开来——在许多方面,甚至与白宫无关。相关的理想主要不是作为禁止自我交易或“政治”影响的禁令,而是作为更广泛的检察独立规范。
更新日期:2022-02-03
中文翻译:
帝国检察官?
联邦检察官在美国法律体系中的权力是帝国的。当他们采取行动时,检察官在所有决策领域代表整个美国政府发言。理想情况下,他们的判断,在每年数以千计的零售调查和起诉决定中表达出来,旨在与其他行政部门参与者的利益隔离开来——在许多方面,甚至与白宫无关。相关的理想主要不是作为禁止自我交易或“政治”影响的禁令,而是作为更广泛的检察独立规范。