Research–practice partnerships (RPPs) have grown rapidly in the last decade in the United States to challenge traditional notions of education research by emphasizing the importance of researchers and practitioners working together in a spirit of mutuality to develop research questions, collect data, implement interventions, and analyze and use findings. RPP scholarship in the United States has historically advocated for the need to pay more focused attention to issues of equity and justice. To address that need, this literature review examined how RPPs in the United States have addressed equity and justice in their work. Based on five dimensions of equity and justice that could be observed within the 149 examples of RPP work we reviewed, we identified 17 exemplar projects that explicitly and effectively forefront equity and justice in RPPs, what we call equity-focused. Implications suggest that researchers and practitioners who have initiated equity-orientated RPPs may reflect on the partnerships’ existing strengths, specifically related to the five interconnected features that characterize equity-focused RPPs, to sustain and advance equity and justice through RPPs.

在过去的十年里，研究-实践伙伴关系 (RPP) 在美国迅速发展，通过强调研究人员和实践者本着相互合作的精神共同开发研究问题、收集数据、实施干预措施的重要性来挑战传统的教育研究概念，并分析和使用调查结果。美国的 RPP 奖学金历来主张需要更加关注公平和正义问题。为了满足这一需求，这篇文献综述研究了美国的 RPP 如何在其工作中解决公平和正义问题。基于在我们审查的 149 个 RPP 工作示例中可以观察到的公平和正义的五个维度，我们确定了 17 个示例项目，这些项目明确有效地突出了 RPP 中的公平和正义，我们所说的以股权为中心。启示表明，发起以股权为导向的 RPP 的研究人员和从业者可能会反思伙伴关系的现有优势，特别是与以股权为中心的 RPP 的五个相互关联的特征相关，以通过 RPP 维持和促进公平和正义。