当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Georgetown Law Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Nixon/Trump: Strategies of Judicial Aggrandizement
The Georgetown Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-01
Josh Chafetz

InTrump v. VanceandTrump v. Mazars, the Supreme Court applied very different standards for subpoenas issued for the personal papers of the president, making it easier for a grand jury to acquire such materials than a congressional committee. The two opinions, both authored by Chief Justice Roberts, have been widely praised for suggesting that the president is not wholly above the law; indeed, they have been treated as the second coming of theNixon Tapes Case.

中文翻译:

尼克松/特朗普:司法强化战略

在特朗普诉万斯案和特朗普诉玛泽斯案中,最高法院对针对总统个人文件发出的传票采用了截然不同的标准,这使得大陪审团比国会委员会更容易获得此类材料。这两份意见均由首席大法官罗伯茨撰写,因暗示总统并非完全凌驾于法律之上而广受赞誉;的确,它们被视为尼克松磁带案的第二次降临。
更新日期:2021-11-16
down
wechat
bug