With growing economic inequality, questions of distributive justice have become increasingly prominent in legal scholarship, particularly public law scholarship. Civil procedure scholarship has been no exception, traditionally addressing such questions under the heading of “access to justice.” And yet, despite the ubiquity of the phrase, discussions of access to justice have tended to focus almost exclusively onhowprocedural resources and opportunities should be distributed and, accordingly,whoshould receive any given share of those resources and opportunities. Much less attention has been paid towhat, exactly, is being distributed—which specific goods access to justice actually comprises. Perhaps because of this vagueness, proponents of access to justice have coalesced around a fairly stable set of policy positions on a wide range of procedural issues.

中文翻译：

---

分配民事司法

随着经济不平等的加剧，分配正义问题在法律学术尤其是公法学术中变得越来越突出。民事诉讼奖学金也不例外，传统上在“诉诸司法”的标题下解决此类问题。然而，尽管这个词无处不在，但关于诉诸司法的讨论几乎完全集中在程序资源和机会应该如何分配上，因此，谁应该获得这些资源和机会的任何给定份额。很少有人关注究竟是什么被分配了——哪些具体的商品诉诸司法实际上包括哪些内容。或许是因为这种模糊，