On June 17, 2021, the United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded a suit filed against Nestlé USA and Cargill under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) for lack of jurisdiction. This case has already garnered attention over the nature of the dispute (child slaves in Africa), the Supreme Court's treatment of jurisdiction under the ATS, and the finding shared by five of the nine Supreme Court justices that domestic corporations can potentially be sued under the ATS. This analysis focuses on the child slavery and global supply chain aspects of the decision.

中文翻译：

---

雀巢美国公司诉美国能源部。141 年代。1931 年。

2021 年 6 月 17 日，美国最高法院撤销并发回根据《外国人侵权法》 (ATS) 对雀巢美国和嘉吉提起的诉讼，理由是缺乏管辖权。本案已引起关注，包括争议的性质（非洲的儿童奴隶）、最高法院根据 ATS 对管辖权的处理方式，以及最高法院 9 名法官中的 5 名共同认为国内公司可能会根据ATS。该分析侧重于儿童奴役和全球供应链方面的决策。