当前位置: X-MOL 学术Am. J. Int. Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Case C-66/18
American Journal of International Law ( IF 2.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-15 , DOI: 10.1017/ajil.2021.45
Csongor István Nagy 1
Affiliation  

On October 6, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Commission v. Hungary. It found that Hungary had violated the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), as well as internal European Union law—specifically the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EU Charter). The case arose out of Hungary's 2017 amendment to its higher education law. The amendment imposed two novel requirements on foreign universities operating in Hungary. It barred any non-EU university from operating unless its country of origin concluded a specific enabling treaty with Hungary. Moreover, it required that the foreign university actually provide educational services in its country of origin. While framed in general terms, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that the 2017 amendment was aimed at ending the operations of the Central European University (CEU) in Hungary.

中文翻译:

案例 C-66/18

2020 年 10 月 6 日,欧盟法院 (CJEU) 在委员会诉匈牙利. 它发现匈牙利违反了《服务贸易总协定》(GATS)以及欧盟内部法律——特别是《欧盟基本权利宪章》(EU Charter)。此案源于匈牙利 2017 年对其高等教育法的修正案。该修正案对在匈牙利运营的外国大学提出了两项​​新要求。它禁止任何非欧盟大学运营,除非其原籍国与匈牙利签订了具体的授权条约。此外,它要求外国大学在其原籍国实际提供教育服务。虽然笼统地说,但很难避免这样的结论,即 2017 年的修正案旨在结束匈牙利中欧大学 (CEU) 的运营。
更新日期:2021-10-15
down
wechat
bug