To understand and address better the myriad and entrenched disparities faced by Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC), researchers have increasingly begun to focus on racism rather than race itself as a driver of health and social inequities (Boyd, Lindo, Weeks, & McLemore, 2020; James & Iacopetti, 2021; Mateo & Williams, 2021). Racism, sexism, cis-centrism and transphobia, heterocentrism and homophobia, and ableism, among other “isms,” and health and social inequities all have long-standing and entrenched histories, but recently attention to intersectionality has been increasing in frequency and depth (Bowleg, 2020). Coined by Crenshaw (1989), intersectionality refers to the interaction and interplay of multiple forms of discrimination, marginalization, exclusion, and stigma (herein referred to as “oppression” for the sake of brevity). Research on intersectionality has mirrored the growth in attention, including challenges for state-of-the-art research (for reviews, see Bauer et al., 2021; Jackson-Best & Edwards, 2018; Layland et al., 2020; Nichols & Stahl, 2019). This article builds on the “racism, not race” imperative to (a) derive lessons learned for more valid and rigorous intersectionality research; (b) identify gaps, challenges, and opportunities that have received less, if any, attention in the literature; and (c) describe action steps for social work researchers and the larger research enterprise.

中文翻译：

---

向交叉研究和研究企业学习“种族主义，而不是种族”

为了更好地理解和解决黑人、土著和有色人种 (BIPOC) 面临的无数根深蒂固的差异，研究人员越来越开始关注种族主义，而不是将种族本身作为健康和社会不平等的驱动因素（博伊德、林多、威克斯, & McLemore, 2020; James & Iacopetti, 2021; Mateo & Williams, 2021)。种族主义、性别歧视、顺式中心主义和跨性别恐惧症、异中心主义和同性恋恐惧症、能力主义以及其他“主义”，以及健康和社会不平等都有长期存在和根深蒂固的历史，但最近对交叉性的关注越来越频繁和深入（鲍勒格，2020 年）。由 Crenshaw (1989) 创造，交叉性指多种形式的歧视、边缘化、排斥和污名（为简洁起见，此处称为“压迫”）的相互作用和相互作用。对交叉性的研究反映了关注度的增长，包括对最先进研究的挑战（有关评论，请参阅 Bauer 等人，2021 年；Jackson-Best 和 Edwards，2018 年；Layland 等人，2020 年；Nichols 和斯塔尔，2019 年）。本文建立在“种族主义，而不是种族”的必要性之上，以 (a) 为更有效和严格的交叉性研究汲取经验教训；(b) 找出文献中较少关注的差距、挑战和机遇；(c) 描述社会工作研究人员和更大的研究企业的行动步骤。