Ecotoxicology ( IF 2.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-11 , DOI: 10.1007/s10646-021-02459-6 Irisdoris Rodrigues de Souza 1 , Andrezza Di Pietro Micali Canavez 2 , Desiree Cigaran Schuck 2 , Viviana Stephanie Costa Gagosian 1 , Isisdoris Rodrigues de Souza 1 , Taynah Vicari 1 , Edvaldo da Silva Trindade 3 , Marta Margarete Cestari 4 , Marcio Lorencini 2 , Daniela Morais Leme 4
Fish cell spheroids are promising 3D culture models for vertebrate replacement in ecotoxicology. However, new alternative ecotoxicological methods must be adapted for applications in industry and for regulatory purposes; such methods must be cost-effective, simple to manipulate and provide rapid results. Therefore, we compared the effectiveness of the traditional hanging drop (HD), orbital shaking (OS), and HD combined with OS (HD+OS) methods on the formation of zebrafish cell line spheroids (ZFL and ZEM2S). Time in HD (3–5 days) and different 96-well plates [flat-bottom or ultra-low attachment of round-bottom (ULA-plates)] in OS were evaluated. Easy handling, rapid spheroid formation, uniform-sized spheroids, and circularity were assessed to identify the best spheroid protocol. Traditional HD alone did not result in ZFL spheroid formation, whereas HD (5 days)+OS did. When using the OS, spheroids only formed on the ULA-plate. Both HD+OS and OS were reproducible in size (177.50 ± 2.81 µm and 225.62 ± 19.20 µm, respectively) and circularity (0.83 ± 0.02 and 0.80 ± 0.01, respectively) of ZFL spheroids. Nevertheless, HD+OS required a considerable time to completely form spheroids (10 days) and intensive handling, whereas the OS was fast (5 days of incubation) and simple. OS also yielded reproducible ZEM2S spheroids in 1 day (226.23 ± 0.57 µm diameter and 0.80 ± 0.01 circularity). In conclusion, OS in ULA-plate is an effective and simple spheroid protocol for high-throughput ecotoxicity testing. This study contributes to identify a fast, reproducible, and simple protocol of single piscine spheroid formation in 96-well plates and supports the application of fish 3D model in industry and academia.
中文翻译:
斑马鱼肝脏和胚胎细胞系 3D 培养的开发:不同球体形成方法的比较
鱼细胞球体是生态毒理学中脊椎动物替代的有前途的 3D 培养模型。然而,新的替代生态毒理学方法必须适用于工业应用和监管目的;此类方法必须具有成本效益、易于操作并能迅速产生结果。因此,我们比较了传统悬滴 (HD)、轨道振动 (OS) 和 HD 结合 OS (HD+OS) 方法对斑马鱼细胞系球体(ZFL 和 ZEM2S)形成的有效性。评估了 OS 中 HD(3-5 天)和不同 96 孔板 [平底或超低圆底附着(ULA 板)] 的时间。对易于处理、快速球体形成、均匀大小的球体和圆度进行了评估,以确定最佳的球体方案。单独的传统 HD 不会导致 ZFL 球体形成,而 HD(5 天)+OS 做到了。使用操作系统时,球体仅在 ULA 板上形成。HD+OS 和 OS 在 ZFL 球体的大小(分别为 177.50 ± 2.81 µm 和 225.62 ± 19.20 µm)和圆度(分别为 0.83 ± 0.02 和 0.80 ± 0.01)方面均具有可重现性。然而,HD+OS 需要相当长的时间才能完全形成球体(10 天)和密集处理,而 OS 快速(孵化 5 天)且简单。OS 还在 1 天内产生了可重复的 ZEM2S 球体(226.23 ± 0.57 µm 直径和 0.80 ± 0.01 圆度)。总之,ULA 板中的 OS 是用于高通量生态毒性测试的有效且简单的球体协议。这项研究有助于确定一种快速、可重复、