当前位置: X-MOL 学术Foodborne Pathog. Dis. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Restaurant Date-Marking Practices Concerning Ready-to-Eat Food Requiring Time and Temperature Control for Safety
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease ( IF 1.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-29 , DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2021.0003
Laura Green Brown 1 , Shideh Delrahim Ebrahim-Zadeh 1 , E Rickamer Hoover 1 , Lauren DiPrete 2 , Bailey Matis 3 , Brendalee Viveiros 4 , Douglas J Irving 5 , Deanna Copeland 6 , David Nicholas 7 , Nicole Hedeen 8 , Joyce Tuttle 9 , Laurie Williams 10 , Girvin Liggans 10 , Adam Kramer 1
Affiliation  

Certain foods are more vulnerable to foodborne pathogen growth and formation of toxins than others. Lack of time and temperature control for these foods can result in the growth of pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, and lead to foodborne outbreaks. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Food Code classifies these foods as time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and details safe cooking, holding, and storing temperatures for these foods. The FDA Food Code also includes a date-marking provision for ready-to-eat TCS foods that are held for >24 h. The provision states that these foods should not be held in refrigeration for >7 days and should be marked with the date or day by which the food should be “consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded.” To learn more about restaurants' date-marking practices, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net) conducted observations and manager interviews in 359 restaurants in 8 EHS-Net jurisdictions. Managers reported that they date marked ready-to-eat TCS foods more often than data collectors observed this practice (91% vs. 77%). Observation data showed almost a quarter of study restaurants did not date-mark ready-to-eat TCS foods. In addition, restaurants with an internal date-marking policy date marked 1.25 times more often than restaurants without such a policy and chain restaurants date marked 5.02 times more often than independently owned restaurants. These findings suggest that regulators and the retail food industry may improve food safety and lower the burden of foodborne illness in the United States if they target interventions to independent restaurants and encourage strong date-marking policies.

中文翻译:

餐厅关于即食食品的日期标记实践需要时间和温度控制以确保安全

某些食物比其他食物更容易受到食源性病原体生长和毒素形成的影响。这些食物缺乏时间和温度控制会导致病原体的生长,例如单核细胞增生李斯特菌、并导致食源性疾病爆发。美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 的食品法典将这些食品分类为安全 (TCS) 食品的时间/温度控制,并详细说明了这些食品的安全烹饪、保存和储存温度。FDA 食品法典还包括对保存时间超过 24 小时的即食 TCS 食品的日期标记规定。该条款规定,这些食品不应冷藏保存超过 7 天,并应标明食品应“在场所内消费、出售或丢弃”的日期或日期。为了详细了解餐厅的日期标记做法,疾病控制和预防中心的环境健康专家网络 (EHS-Net) 对 8 个 EHS-Net 辖区的 359 家餐厅进行了观察和经理访谈。管理人员报告说,他们比数据收集者观察到的这种做法更频繁地标记即食 TCS 食品(91% 对 77%)。观察数据显示,近四分之一的研究餐厅没有对即食 TCS 食品进行日期标记。此外,具有内部日期标记政策的餐厅标记日期的频率是没有此类政策的餐厅的 1.25 倍,而连锁餐厅的日期标记频率是独立拥有的餐厅的 5.02 倍。这些研究结果表明,如果监管机构和零售食品行业针对独立餐厅采取干预措施并鼓励强有力的日期标记政策,他们可能会改善食品安全并降低美国的食源性疾病负担。观察数据显示,近四分之一的研究餐厅没有对即食 TCS 食品进行日期标记。此外,具有内部日期标记政策的餐厅标记日期的频率是没有此类政策的餐厅的 1.25 倍,而连锁餐厅的日期标记频率是独立拥有的餐厅的 5.02 倍。这些研究结果表明,如果监管机构和零售食品行业针对独立餐厅采取干预措施并鼓励强有力的日期标记政策,他们可能会改善食品安全并降低美国的食源性疾病负担。观察数据显示,近四分之一的研究餐厅没有对即食 TCS 食品进行日期标记。此外,具有内部日期标记政策的餐厅标记日期的频率是没有此类政策的餐厅的 1.25 倍,而连锁餐厅的日期标记频率是独立拥有的餐厅的 5.02 倍。这些研究结果表明,如果监管机构和零售食品行业针对独立餐厅采取干预措施并鼓励强有力的日期标记政策,他们可能会改善食品安全并降低美国的食源性疾病负担。02 倍于独立经营的餐厅。这些研究结果表明,如果监管机构和零售食品行业针对独立餐厅采取干预措施并鼓励强有力的日期标记政策,他们可能会改善食品安全并降低美国的食源性疾病负担。02 倍于独立经营的餐厅。这些研究结果表明,如果监管机构和零售食品行业针对独立餐厅采取干预措施并鼓励强有力的日期标记政策,他们可能会改善食品安全并降低美国的食源性疾病负担。
更新日期:2021-11-07
down
wechat
bug