印度东北与民族国家之谜,Alternatives: Global, Local, Political

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Alternatives: Global, Local, Political › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

印度东北与民族国家之谜
Alternatives: Global, Local, Political ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2017-08-01 , DOI: 10.1177/0304375418761514
Bhupen Sarmah ₁

Affiliation

在印度独立之初，“印度主流民族主义者”面临的主要挑战之一是“东北”与被设想为民族国家的印度的政治融合。在印度独立之前，殖民地边疆的一些地方，如纳迦山，已经见证了与主权想象平行的民族主义话语。印度独立后，该地区的地缘政治意义使印度民族国家项目变得困难，而印度和巴基斯坦（东西方）的分治经验塑造了印度和巴基斯坦（东西方）的分裂，创造了一个不太有利的国际政治环境. 陷入困境的边缘地区的后殖民历史以强加的同质性概念以及民族国家（或印度主流）和东北部的二元论为标志。政治理论家长期以来一直驳斥民族同质性的概念。然而，殖民逻辑所构建的平原和山谷之间的二分法过去和现在都被民族国家意识形态所强化，将外围变成了冲突的大锅。本文在殖民干预和民族国家一体化逻辑的背景下，批判性地探讨了自独立以来该地区所见证的冲突历史。本文认为，印度政府为整合该地区而采取的政治和发展战略导致了以不同形式长期存在的冲突。把外围变成冲突的大锅。本文在殖民干预和民族国家一体化逻辑的背景下，批判性地探讨了自独立以来该地区所见证的冲突历史。本文认为，印度政府为整合该地区而采取的政治和发展战略导致了以不同形式长期存在的冲突。把外围变成冲突的大锅。本文在殖民干预和民族国家一体化逻辑的背景下，批判性地探讨了自独立以来该地区所见证的冲突历史。本文认为，印度政府为整合该地区而采取的政治和发展战略导致了以不同形式长期存在的冲突。

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

India’s Northeast and the Enigma of the Nation-state

One of the major challenges before the “mainstream Indian nationalists” at the dawn of India’s independence was the political integration of the “Northeast” with India envisaged as a nation-state. Some parts of the colonial frontier, such as the Naga Hills, had already witnessed a parallel nationalist discourse with the imagination of sovereignty before India’s independence. With independence, the Indian nation-state project was made difficult by the geopolitical significance of the region, shaped by the experience of the partition, which separated India and Pakistan (East and West), creating a milieu of not-so-favorable international politics. The postcolonial history of the troubled periphery has been marked by an imposed notion of homogeneity and a binary of the nation-state (or the Indian mainstream) and the Northeast. Political theorists have long refuted the notion of national homogeneity. Nevertheless, the dichotomy between the plains and the valley constructed by the colonial logic was and is reinforced by the nation-state ideology, turning the periphery into a cauldron of conflict. This article engages critically with the history of conflict witnessed in the region since independence, against the backdrop of colonial interventions and the integrationist logic of the nation-state. This article argues that the political and developmental strategies, adopted by the Indian state to integrate the region, have led to the perpetuation of conflict in different forms.

更新日期：2017-08-01

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊新发论文