Abstract The speech of two fluent and three non-fluent aphasic patients was analysed using the quantitative method devised by Saffran, Berndt and Schwartz et al. (Brain and Language 37, 440–479, 1989) [6]. The differences between agrammatic and non-agrammatic aphasic speech were broadly replicated, in that the non-agrammatic non-fluent patients were impaired only on measures of syntactic complexity and well-formedness. The fluent patients' sentence production was indistinguishable from that of the non-fluent non-agrammatics, except with respect to fluency itself. All five patients were retested 1–2 years after the first sample. The two patients who had improved in the quantitative analysis showed a similar improvement in picture naming. For one patient at least, an increased availability of low-frequency nouns appeared to be underlying this improvement.

中文翻译：

---

灰姑娘重温：流利和非流利失语症的比较

摘要 使用 Saffran、Berndt 和 Schwartz 等人设计的定量方法分析了两名流利和三名不流利的失语症患者的言语。(Brain and Language 37, 440–479, 1989) [6]。无语法和非语法失语症语音之间的差异被广泛复制，因为非语法不流利的患者仅在句法复杂性和格式良好的措施上受到损害。流利患者的造句与非流利非语法患者的造句没有区别，除了流利本身。在第一个样本后 1-2 年对所有 5 名患者进行了重新测试。在定量分析中有所改善的两名患者在图片命名方面表现出类似的改善。至少对一名患者来说，