背景
老年人在阻力运动训练对肌肉力量的影响方面表现出广泛的个体差异(异质性)。驱动这种异质性的机制知之甚少。了解这些机制可以允许开发更有针对性的干预措施和/或改进识别可能对阻力训练干预措施有反应的个体。因此,本研究评估了可能导致老年人力量反应异质性的潜在生理因素:神经激活、肌肉肥大和肌肉收缩力。
方法
在 24 名老年人(72.3 ± 6.8 岁)中,我们在 12 周的渐进阻力运动训练前后测量了以下参数:i)等长腿伸肌力量;ii) 等速(60°/秒)腿部伸肌力量;iii) 通过比较随意和电刺激的肌肉力量进行随意(神经)激活(即叠加双峰技术);iv) 通过双能 X 射线吸收测定法 (DXA) 估计区域瘦组织质量的肌肉肥大;和 v) 由电诱发的抽搐和双重扭矩产生的内在收缩性。我们检查了生理因素(基线值和相对变化)与等长和等速肌肉力量的相对变化之间的关联。
结果
值得注意的是,股四头肌收缩力的变化与等速运动的相对改善呈正相关(r = 0.37-0.46,p ≤ 0.05),但与等长肌力量无关(r = 0.09-0.21)。自愿激活的变化与等长或等速力量的相对改善没有显着关联(分别为 r = 0.35 和 0.33;p > 0.05)。此外,大腿瘦体重的变化与等长或等速力量的相对改善没有显着相关性(分别为 r = 0.09 和 -0.02;p > 0.05)。有点令人惊讶的是,运动引起的等长和等速力量变化之间缺乏关联(r = 0.07)。
结论
老年人对阻力运动的力量反应似乎与收缩类型有关。因此,未来的研究应考虑获得多种肌肉力量测量值,以确保对力量适应进行全面评估。瘦体重的变化并不能解释两种收缩类型的力量反应的异质性,关于自愿激活影响的数据也没有定论。对于等速收缩,力量反应可以通过阻力运动引起的肌肉收缩性变化的受试者间差异来适度解释。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Heterogeneity of the strength response to progressive resistance exercise training in older adults: Contributions of muscle contractility
Background
Older adults display wide individual variability (heterogeneity) in the effects of resistance exercise training on muscle strength. The mechanisms driving this heterogeneity are poorly understood. Understanding of these mechanisms could permit development of more targeted interventions and/or improved identification of individuals likely to respond to resistance training interventions. Thus, this study assessed potential physiological factors that may contribute to strength response heterogeneity in older adults: neural activation, muscle hypertrophy, and muscle contractility.
Methods
In 24 older adults (72.3 ± 6.8 years), we measured the following parameters before and after 12 weeks of progressive resistance exercise training: i) isometric leg extensor strength; ii) isokinetic (60°/sec) leg extensor strength; iii) voluntary (neural) activation by comparing voluntary and electrically-stimulated muscle forces (i.e., superimposed doublet technique); iv) muscle hypertrophy via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) estimates of regional lean tissue mass; and v) intrinsic contractility by electrically-elicited twitch and doublet torques. We examined associations between physiological factors (baseline values and relative change) and the relative change in isometric and isokinetic muscle strength.
Results
Notably, changes in quadriceps contractility were positively associated with the relative improvement in isokinetic (r = 0.37–0.46, p ≤ 0.05), but not isometric strength (r = 0.09–0.21). Change in voluntary activation did not exhibit a significant association with the relative improvements in either isometric or isokinetic strength (r = 0.35 and 0.33, respectively; p > 0.05). Additionally, change in thigh lean mass was not significantly associated with relative improvement in isometric or isokinetic strength (r = 0.09 and −0.02, respectively; p > 0.05). Somewhat surprising was the lack of association between exercise-induced changes in isometric and isokinetic strength (r = 0.07).
Conclusions
The strength response to resistance exercise in older adults appears to be contraction-type dependent. Therefore, future investigations should consider obtaining multiple measures of muscle strength to ensure that strength adaptations are comprehensively assessed. Changes in lean mass did not explain the heterogeneity in strength response for either contraction type, and the data regarding the influence of voluntary activation was inconclusive. For isokinetic contraction, the strength response was moderately explained by between-subject variance in the resistance-exercise induced changes in muscle contractility.