八项照顾者自我效能量表（CSES-8）的开发和评估。,The Gerontologist

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Gerontologist › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

八项照顾者自我效能量表（CSES-8）的开发和评估。
The Gerontologist ( IF 4.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-03-28 , DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa174
Philip L Ritter ₁ , Khushboo Sheth _{1,

2} , Anita L Stewart ₃ , Dolores Gallagher-Thompson ₄ , Kate Lorig ₁

Affiliation

背景和目的本文描述了一个简短的照顾自我效能测量的开发和评估。自我管理的 8 项照顾者自我效能量表 (CSES-8) 旨在反映典型照顾者支持干预措施的组成部分，并在未来的自我效能和照顾研究中具有实用性。研究设我们评估了两个样本中 CSES-8 的完成率、项目量表相关性、可靠性、描述性统计和初步结构效度，以及对干预样本变化的敏感性。结果干预照料者的样本（N = 158）是 85% 的女性（平均年龄 = 65 岁）。在线调查样本（N = 138）是 90% 的女性（平均年龄 = 78）。在这两个样本中，CSES-8 具有出色的内部一致性可靠性（0.89 和 0.88）和良好的分布，具有足够的可变性来检测变化。在线样本的重测信度良好（0.73）。作为结构有效性的证据，大多数假设在两个样本中都得到了证实。CSES-8 对干预计划中护理人员在 6 个月时的变化敏感（p < .001）。讨论和意义 CSES-8 简短、全面，涵盖了改善护理人员生活质量的干预措施的常见组成部分，并且对变化很敏感。它可以发挥有用的作用，探索照顾者干预研究的工作机制，

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Development and Evaluation of the Eight-Item Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES-8).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This paper describes the development and evaluation of a short caregiving self-efficacy measure. The self-administered 8-item Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES-8) was developed to reflect components of typical caregiver support interventions and to be practical for inclusion in future self-efficacy and caregiving research. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We administered the CSES-8 in 2 samples: participants in an intervention for caregivers of persons with cognitive disabilities, and a voluntary online survey for caregivers of adults. We evaluated the completion rate, item-scale correlations, reliability, descriptive statistics, and preliminary construct validity of the CSES-8 in both samples, and sensitivity to change in the intervention sample. RESULTS The intervention caregivers' sample (N = 158) was 85% female (mean age = 65 years). The online survey sample (N = 138) was 90% female (mean age = 78). In both samples, the CSES-8 had excellent internal consistency reliability (.89 and .88) and good distribution with sufficient variability to detect change. Test-retest reliability was good in the online sample (.73). As evidence of construct validity, most hypotheses were confirmed in both samples. The CSES-8 was sensitive to change at 6 months for caregivers in the intervention program (p < .001). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS The CSES-8 is short, comprehensive with respect to common components of interventions to improve caregivers' quality of life, and sensitive to change. It can serve a useful role exploring mechanisms by which caregiver intervention studies work, and it can be helpful in examining whether self-efficacy mediates the effect of these interventions on various outcomes such as psychological well-being.

更新日期：2020-11-04

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊最新论文

全部期刊列表>>