摘要
在这项工作中,使用基于咪唑和三乙基甲基氯化铵的深共熔溶剂(DES)作为反应介质,用正辛基琥珀酸酐(OSA)酯化纤维素纳米纤维(CNF)和全纤维素复合材料(ACC)膜,从而获得高强度和可持续性的膜,具有增加的疏水性。漫反射红外傅里叶变换光谱和X射线光电子能谱证明了该修饰方法的成功。在干燥,潮湿和湿润的条件下分析了改性膜的机械强度,并通过接触角测量表明了膜的疏水性。另外,表征了膜的吸水率和透明性。修改被证明是简单快捷的,在80°C反应温度和1 h反应时间的温和条件下使用。与参考CNF膜相比,DES / OSA改性的CNF膜在干燥,潮湿和湿润的条件下表现出更好的机械性能,并且DES / OSA改性的ACC膜在湿态下显示出比参考CNF膜显着更高的机械性能(31 MPa拉伸强度和6.1%的断裂应变,分别为18 MPa和2.2%。这些改进部分归因于与CNF膜(37°)相比,改性膜的接触角更高(ACC-DES / OSA 60°和CNF-DES / OSA 51°)。与参比CNF膜相比,DES / OSA改性的ACC膜和DES / OSA改性的ACC膜在湿态下显示出显着更高的机械性能(抗张强度为31 MPa,断裂应变为6.1%,而抗张强度分别为18 MPa和2.2%)。这些改进部分归因于与CNF膜(37°)相比,改性膜的接触角更高(ACC-DES / OSA 60°和CNF-DES / OSA 51°)。与参比CNF膜相比,DES / OSA改性的ACC膜和DES / OSA改性的ACC膜在湿态下显示出显着更高的机械性能(抗张强度为31 MPa,断裂应变为6.1%,而抗张强度分别为18 MPa和2.2%)。这些改进部分归因于与CNF膜(37°)相比,改性膜的接触角更高(ACC-DES / OSA 60°和CNF-DES / OSA 51°)。
图形摘要
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Hydrophobic modification of nanocellulose and all-cellulose composite films using deep eutectic solvent as a reaction medium
Abstract
In this work, deep eutectic solvent (DES) based on imidazole and triethylmethylammonium chloride was used as a reaction medium for the esterification of cellulose nanofiber (CNF) and all-cellulose composite (ACC) films with n-octylsuccinic anhydride (OSA) to obtain high strength and sustainable films with increased hydrophobicity. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were used to prove the success of the modification. The mechanical strength of the modified films was analyzed in dry, humid, and wet conditions, and the hydrophobicity of the films was indicated in terms of contact angle measurements. In addition, water absorption and transparency of the films were characterized. The modification was proven to be simple and fast, and mild conditions of 80 °C reaction temperature and 1 h reaction time were used. DES/OSA- modified CNF film exhibited better mechanical properties in dry, humid, and wet conditions compared to reference CNF film, and DES/OSA-modified ACC film displayed notable higher mechanical properties in wet state compared to that of reference CNF film (31 MPa tensile strength and 6.1% strain at break vs. 18 MPa and 2.2%, respectively). These improvements were partly attributed to higher contact angles of modified films (ACC-DES/OSA 60° and CNF-DES/OSA 51°) compared to CNF film (37°).
Graphic abstract