Identification and validation of effective Tier 2 interventions that address a wide range of student-level factors is critical to the sustainability of positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS). Within the context of check-in check-out (CICO), function of behavior affects outcomes for many students, especially for those who engage in problem behavior to escape from tasks. Therefore, more research is needed to understand if and how we can support students with escape-maintained behavior. Breaks are Better (BrB) is a modified version of CICO that includes a system for taking breaks. The current research on BrB is limited but promising. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of CICO to BrB. Using a multitreatment design, we compared the effects of each intervention by measuring problem behavior and academic engagement across five elementary students who engaged in problem behavior to escape from tasks. Overall results were mixed and ranged from strong effects of BrB to no differential effects. However, despite the results, teachers and students consistently rated BrB as being a more preferable intervention. We conclude with limitations and implications for practice.

确定和验证可解决各种学生水平因素的有效第二级干预措施，对于积极行为干预和支持（PBIS）的可持续性至关重要。在签到签到（CICO）的背景下，行为的功能会影响许多学生的结局，尤其是对于那些从事有问题行为以逃避任务的学生。因此，需要更多的研究来了解我们是否以及如何以逃生维持行为来支持学生。更好的休息（BrB）是CICO的修改版，其中包括休息系统。目前对BrB的研究是有限的，但很有希望。本研究的目的是比较CICO与BrB的有效性。使用多处理设计 我们通过测量五名从事问题行为以逃避任务的小学生的问题行为和学术投入，比较了每种干预措施的效果。总体结果好坏参半，从BrB的强效到无差异。但是，尽管取得了这些结果，但教师和学生始终认为BrB是更可取的干预措施。我们总结了实践的局限性和含义。