Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-29 , DOI: 10.1177/10983007211003335 Amy M. Briesch 1 , Sandra M. Chafouleas 2 , Jennifer N. Dineen 2 , D. Betsy McCoach 2 , Aberdine Donaldson 1
Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention.
中文翻译:
校舍管理员报告,涵盖学术,行为和健康领域的筛查实践
迄今为止进行的研究对跨学术,行为和健康领域的基于学校的筛查实践的情况提供了有限的了解,从而为当前的调查研究提供了动力。代表美国409个独特学区的总计475 K-12校舍管理人员完成了一项在线调查,该调查评估了从数据收集到干预选择的各个领域的当前基于学校的筛查实践。70%至81%的受访者分别报告了在健康和学术领域使用通用筛查,而只有9%的受访者赞成使用通用的社会,情感和行为筛查。此外,在以下方面还发现了跨域的差异:(a)谁审查筛查数据,(b)如何使用筛选数据确定学生的风险,以及(c)如何为那些表现出风险的学生设计干预措施。实践中缺乏共识,要求传播有关实施社会,情感和行为筛查的最佳实践;风险识别;和方法1的干预。