当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Crime and Justice
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Future of Parole Release
Crime and Justice ( IF 3.6 ) Pub Date : 2017-01-01 , DOI: 10.1086/688616 Edward E. Rhine , Joan Petersilia , Kevin R. Reitz
Crime and Justice ( IF 3.6 ) Pub Date : 2017-01-01 , DOI: 10.1086/688616 Edward E. Rhine , Joan Petersilia , Kevin R. Reitz
American parole boards have played a critical role in the formulation and administration of states’ prison policies in recent decades—and could play an equally important part in helping end mass incarceration. Long neglected by academic, research, and policy communities, systems of discretionary prison release are in need of improvement, if not “reinvention.” A plan for revitalization of parole release should lay out a comprehensive and aspirational model for the future. It must address the institutional structure of parole boards, how much release discretion they are given, the substantive grounds for release decisions, the use of risk assessments in the decisional process, decision-making tools such as parole release guidelines, the requirements of fair and reliable procedures, victims’ rights at parole hearings, the need for parole supervision in some but not all cases, the intensity of parole conditions, and the length of parole supervision.
中文翻译:
假释的未来
近几十年来,美国假释委员会在州监狱政策的制定和管理中发挥了关键作用,并且在帮助结束大规模监禁方面可以发挥同等重要的作用。长期以来,学术界,研究界和政策界都忽略了酌情释放监狱的制度,即使不是“重新发明”,也需要改进。振兴释放假释的计划应为将来提出一个全面而理想的模型。它必须解决假释委员会的体制结构,给予多少释放酌处权,释放决定的实质依据,决策过程中使用风险评估,假释释放准则等决策工具,公平和公正的要求。可靠的程序,假释听证会上的受害者权利,
更新日期:2017-01-01
中文翻译:
假释的未来
近几十年来,美国假释委员会在州监狱政策的制定和管理中发挥了关键作用,并且在帮助结束大规模监禁方面可以发挥同等重要的作用。长期以来,学术界,研究界和政策界都忽略了酌情释放监狱的制度,即使不是“重新发明”,也需要改进。振兴释放假释的计划应为将来提出一个全面而理想的模型。它必须解决假释委员会的体制结构,给予多少释放酌处权,释放决定的实质依据,决策过程中使用风险评估,假释释放准则等决策工具,公平和公正的要求。可靠的程序,假释听证会上的受害者权利,