Dangers exist in both maximalist approaches to deterrence and minimalist ones. A minimal sufficiency strategy aims to avert these dangers. The objectives are to convince people that the webs of relationships within which they live mean that lawbreaking will ultimately lead to desistance and remorse and to persuading offenders that predatory crime is simply wrong. Alternative support and control strategies should be attempted until desistance finally occurs. Communities can be helped to understand that this is how minimally sufficient deterrence works. By relying on layered strategies, this approach takes deterrence theory onto the terrain of complexity theory. It integrates approaches based on social support and recovery capital, dynamic concentration of deterrence, restorative justice, shame and pride management, responsive regulation, responsivity, indirect reciprocity, and incapacitation. Deterrence fails when it rejects complexity in favor of simple theories such as rational choice.

中文翻译：

---

最低限度的威慑

威慑的最大化方法和最小化方法都存在危险。最低限度的自足战略旨在避免这些危险。目的是使人们相信生活在其中的关系网意味着违法行为将最终导致制止和re悔，并说服罪犯掠夺性犯罪是错误的。应尝试其他支持和控制策略，直到最终出现停顿为止。可以帮助社区了解这是最低限度的威慑工作的方式。通过依赖分层策略，此方法将威慑理论带入了复杂性理论的领域。它融合了基于社会支持和恢复资本，威慑力的动态集中，恢复性司法，耻辱感和自豪感管理，响应性监管，负责任，间接互惠和无能。当威慑力拒绝诸如理性选择等简单理论的复杂性时，威慑就失败了。