当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Entomol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Preference Provides a Plethora of Problems (Don't Panic).
Annual Review of Entomology ( IF 15.0 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-08 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-022720-061725
Michael C Singer 1
Affiliation  

This review was solicited as an autobiography. The “problems” in my title have two meanings. First, they were professional difficulties caused by my decision to study oviposition preferences of butterflies that were not susceptible to traditional preference-testing designs. Until I provided video, my claim that the butterflies duplicate natural post-alighting host-assessment behavior when placed on hosts by hand was not credible, and the preference-testing technique that I had developed elicited skepticism, anger, and derision. The second meaning of “problems” is scientific. Insect preference comes with complex dimensionality that interacts with host acceptability. Part Two of this review describes how my group's work in this area has revealed unexpected axes of variation in plant–insect interactions—axes capable of frustrating attempts to derive unequivocal conclusions from apparently sensible experimental designs. The possibility that these complexities are lurking should be kept in mind as preference and performance experiments are devised.

中文翻译:


偏好提供问题的烦恼(不要惊慌)。

这篇评论被称为自传。我标题中的“问题”有两个含义。首先,由于我决定研究不易受传统偏好测试设计影响的蝴蝶的排卵偏好,因此它们是专业困难。在我提供视频之前,我声称蝴蝶在用手放置在宿主上时复制自然的下宿主后评估行为是不可信的,而且我开发的偏好测试技术引起了怀疑,愤怒和嘲笑。“问题”的第二个含义是科学的。昆虫偏好具有复杂的维度,与宿主的可接受性相互作用。这篇评论的第二部分描述了我的小组如何 该领域的工作揭示了植物与昆虫相互作用的意想不到的变化轴,这些轴能够挫败试图从表面上合理的实验设计中得出明确结论的尝试。设计偏好和性能实验时,应牢记这些复杂性潜伏的可能性。

更新日期:2021-01-10
down
wechat
bug