This study aimed to explore relationships between personality type variables and dream structure variables. In the questionnaire experiment (N = 410), we investigated associations between different personality variables in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator questionnaire (MBTI) and various aspects of dreams in the Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE). The MBTI has four dimensions. In the Extroversion/Introversion (E/I) dimension, I types dreamt more of emotional intensity and passive emotions than E types. In addition, I types may become more distressed in nightmares than E types. E types more frequently shared their dreams with others. In the Sensation/Intuition (S/N) dimension, N types had a more positive attitude toward dreams and can get more novel ideas and help from their dreams than S types. In the dream diary experiment (N = 47), we investigated whether the S/N dimension may influence waking events' incorporation into dreams. External judges decoded paired waking events and dream reports. N types had more metaphorical incorporation than S types. More specifically, N types had more metaphorical expressions in their dreams than S types. This result may be due to the different characteristics between S types and N types. It may provide support for the dream continuity hypothesis.

中文翻译：

---

MBTI中的人格类型与梦想结构变量之间的关系。

本研究旨在探讨人格类型变量与梦境结构变量之间的关系。在调查表实验（N = 410）中，我们调查了Myers-Briggs类型指标调查表（MBTI）中不同人格变量与曼海姆梦调查表（MADRE）中梦的各个方面之间的关联。MBTI具有四个维度。在外向/内向（E / I）维度上，与E类型相比，I类型的梦更多地表现出情感强度和消极情绪。此外，噩梦中的I类型可能比E类型更加痛苦。E型人更常与他人分享梦想。在感觉/直觉（S / N）维度上，N类对梦的态度更积极，可以从梦中得到比S类更多的新颖想法和帮助。在梦想日记实验中（N = 47），我们研究了S / N维数是否会影响唤醒事件并入梦境。外部法官对成对的清醒事件和梦想报告进行解码。N型比S型具有更多的隐喻结合。更具体地说，N类型在梦中比S类型具有更多的隐喻表达。此结果可能是由于S类型和N类型之间的特性不同。它可以为梦的连续性假设提供支持。