澳大利亚脊医对解剖科学的临床相关性和脊椎课程教学的充分性的认识。,Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Chiropr. Man. Therap. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

澳大利亚脊医对解剖科学的临床相关性和脊椎课程教学的充分性的认识。
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-16 , DOI: 10.1186/s12998-020-00325-6
Rosemary Giuriato _{1,

2} , Goran Štrkalj ₁ , Tania Prvan ₃ , Nalini Pather ₁

Affiliation

在所有澳大利亚脊骨疗法教育课程中，本科课程中都必须进行人体解剖学教育。关于临床医生对其解剖学训练的充分性及其与实践的相关性的了解很少。这项研究的目的是评估澳大利亚注册脊医对解剖训练对临床实践的相关性和充分性的看法，并分析他们对在职业前训练中使用的教学资源的有用性的看法。针对澳大利亚注册脊医的样本进行了基于问卷的调查，重点是其解剖学（总体解剖学，组织学，神经解剖学和胚胎学）训练的充分性以及每个子学科的临床相关性，以及所使用的每种不同解剖学教学资源的感知价值。在两次全国脊骨治疗会议上，估计有387名与会者返回了总计128份完成的调查（估计答复率为33％）。受访者占2016年澳大利亚注册脊医的2.6％，并且具有性别代表性（男性占66.4％），但没有年龄代表，老一辈的代表人数过多（峰值年龄在35-44岁与25-34岁之间）。大多数接受调查的受访者在澳大利亚获得了脊椎治疗学资格（89.1％），并在1990年之后毕业，平均在实践中平均为21.7年（SD = 11.3，范围= 1至44）。受访者同样有可能接受过医学，科学，健康科学或其他学院的解剖学培训。被认为与临床实践最相关的学科是神经解剖学（100％的受访者同意）和总体解剖学（99.2％），其次是组织学（86.0％）和胚胎学（81.1％）。受访者还认为他们的训练在神经解剖学（99.3％）和大体解剖学（99.2％）之后是组织学（91.4％）和胚胎学（85％）最为合适。受访者证实，他们接受了专业培训期间使用的各种解剖学教学工具套件，并高度重视尸体和标本的获取。大多数受访者认为解剖学与他们的临床实践高度相关，并指出解剖学已在各种教育方法中得到了充分的讲授。

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Australian chiropractors' perception of the clinical relevance of anatomical sciences and adequacy of teaching in chiropractic curricula.

Human anatomy education is compulsory in the undergraduate curriculum in all Australian chiropractic education programs. There is very little data on clinicians’ perceptions of the adequacy of their anatomy training and its relevance to practice. The aims of this study were to evaluate Australian registered chiropractors’ perceptions on the relevance and adequacy of anatomy training for clinical practice and analyse their opinion on the usefulness of the teaching resources utilized during their preprofessional training. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted on a sample of Australian registered chiropractors focussing on the adequacy of their anatomical science (gross anatomy, histology, neuroanatomy and embryology) training and the clinical relevance of each individual sub-discipline, and the perceived value of each of the different anatomy teaching resources utilized. A total of 128 completed surveys were returned from an estimated 387 attendees at two national chiropractic conferences (estimated 33% response rate). The respondents represent 2.6% of registered chiropractors in Australia in 2016 and were representative in terms of gender (66.4% male) but not age, with older generations being over-represented (peak age group 35–44 vs. 25–34). The majority of the survey respondents obtained their chiropractic qualification in Australia (89.1%) and graduated after 1990 with an average of 21.7 years (SD = 11.3, range = 1–44) in practice. Respondents were equally likely to have undertaken anatomy training in Medicine, Science, Health Science, or other faculties. The disciplines perceived most relevant for clinical practice were neuroanatomy (100% of respondents agreeing) and gross anatomy (99.2%), followed by histology (86.0%) and embryology (81.1%). Respondents also perceived their training to be most adequate in neuroanatomy (99.3%) and gross anatomy (99.2%) followed by histology (91.4%) and embryology (85%). Respondents confirmed exposure to a varied suite of anatomy teaching tools utilized during their pre-professional training and highly valued access to cadavers and prosected specimens. The majority of respondents perceived anatomy as highly relevant to their clinical practice and noted that it was adequately taught within a wide range of educational approaches. These results will assist educators to refine content and delivery of anatomy course offerings to maximize relevance in chiropractic clinical practice.

更新日期：2020-07-24

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊新发论文